Author:
Oladimeji Olawale J.,Fatusi Adesegun O.
Abstract
IntroductionRealist evaluation studies have spanned different aspects of medicine, especially in the field of public health. However, very few of these studies explicitly detailed how program implementation triggered outcomes that could strengthen understanding of its effect on Health System Strengthening in specific settings. In low- and middle-income countries, like Nigeria, there is a paucity of realist evaluation studies, despite the implementation of multiple intervention programs and projects in these countries. This article is aimed at unveiling the black-box of program implementation and Health System Strengthening of the “Abiye” Safe Motherhood Program in Ondo State, Nigeria. Specifically, it identified the role of contextual factors in the “Abiye” program in Ondo State, determined the mechanisms that facilitated or constrained outcomes of the “Abiye” program, and developed a Context Mechanism Outcome (CMO) Configuration from which a Middle Range Theory (MRT) can be framed.MethodologyThis was qualitative research structured along with the realist domains (Context, Mechanism, and Outcome). The Initial Program Theory was validated by the qualitative study, after which a new MRT was developed. The study population comprised key stakeholders, secondary stakeholders, and primary stakeholders in the Abiye safe motherhood program. Data was collected through 10 key informant interviews, 28 in-depth interviews, and six focus group discussions sessions. Thematic analysis was used to analyze all the qualitative data collected, and seven themes with 19 subthemes emerged in the study.ResultsWe identified 13 contextual factors under five principal areas, with most of the factors playing enabling roles, some playing inhibitory roles, while very few played both roles. We elicited eight mechanisms, and some of these facilitated the outcomes, while some constrained the outcomes of the program. Health system strengthening was a key feature of the outcome of the program. We developed a middle-range theory based on the 6 CMO configurations we elicited from the study.Conclusion and Policy ImplicationsRealist evaluation is an iterative process that looks beyond the surface to generate evidence. By applying the realist approach, we generated pieces of evidence that can be adapted for policymaking in public health interventions in LMIC.
Reference66 articles.
1. Realistic Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
PawsonR
TilleyN
1997
2. Realist evaluation for practice;Kazi;Br J Soc Work.,2003
3. RAMESES 11 reporting standards for realist evaluations;Wong;BMC Medicine.,2016
4. The Science of Evaluation: A Realist Manifesto
PawsonR
LondonSAGE Publications2013
5. A Comparative Approach to Policy Analysis: Health Care Policy in Four Nations
LeichterH
12211246CambridgeCambridge University Press1979
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献