Author:
Fank Hélène,Weekers Laurent,Lovinfosse Pierre,Pottel Hans,Seidel Laurence,Jadoul Alexandre,Bouquegneau Antoine,Bonvoisin Catherine,Bovy Christophe,Grosch Stephanie,Erpicum Pauline,Hustinx Roland,Jouret François
Abstract
Introduction[18F]FDG PET/CT noninvasively disproves acute kidney allograft rejection (AR) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with suspected AR. However, the correlation of biopsy-based Banff vs. PET/CT-based scores of acute inflammation remains unknown, as does the prognostic performance of [18F]FDG PET/CT at one year post suspected AR.MethodsFrom 2012 to 2019, 114 [18F]FDG-PET/CTs were prospectively performed in 105 adult KTRs who underwent per cause transplant biopsies. Ordinal logistic regression assessed the correlation between the extent of histological inflammation and the mean standardized [18F]FDG uptake values (mSUVmean). Functional outcomes of kidney allografts were evaluated at one year post per cause biopsy and correlated to mSUVmean.ResultsA significant correlation between mSUVmean and acute Banff score was found, with an adjusted R2 of 0.25. The mSUVmean was significantly different between subgroups of “total i”, with 2.30 ± 0.71 in score 3 vs. 1.68 ± 0.24 in score 0. Neither the function nor the survival of the graft at one year was statistically related to mSUVmean.Discussion[18F]FDG-PET/CT may help noninvasively assess the severity of kidney allograft inflammation in KTRs with suspected AR, but it does not predict graft outcomes at one year.