Author:
Habib Emad H.,Miles Brian,Skilton Liz,ElSaadani Mohamed,Osland Anna C.,Willis Emma,Miller Robert,Do Trung,Barnes Stephen R.
Abstract
The lack of community-relevant flood informational resources and tools often results in inadequate and divergent understandings of flood risk and can impede communities' ability to function cohesively in the face of increasing flood threats. The current study reports on a set of workshops that the authors conducted with various groups (citizens, city engineers and planners, realtors and builders, and media representatives) within a flood prone community to evaluate how novel hydroinformatic tools that include hydrodynamic modeling, geospatial visualization, and socioeconomic analysis can enhance understanding of flood risk and engagement in flood risk mitigation among diverse community members. The workshops were designed to help identify stakeholder preferences regarding key functionality needed for integrated hydroinformatic technologies and socioeconomic analyses for flood risk reduction. Workshop participants were asked to use and comment on examples of prototype flood risk informational tools, such as: (1) flood damage estimation tool, (2) drivability and emergency accessibility tool, and (3) community-scale social and economic metrics tool. Data gathered from workshops were analyzed using qualitative analysis based on a grounded-theory approach. Data were coded by hand based on themes identified by the research team and incorporated deviant case analysis to ensure minority opinions was represented. The study results are focused on the following main themes and how flood tools can address them: (1) improving the understanding of flood risk and engagement in flood risk mitigation, (2) reducing the gap between individual and community risk, (3) challenges in communicating flood risk information, (4) enhancing relevance to and engagement of the community, and (5) enabling actionable information. Our research demonstrates the need for community-anchored tools and technologies that can illustrate local context, include local historical and simulated events at multiple levels of community impact, enable analyses by flood professionals while also providing simplified tools of use by citizens, and allow individuals to expand their knowledge beyond their homes, businesses, and places of work.
Subject
Water Science and Technology
Reference39 articles.
1. Economic evaluation of coastal land loss in Louisiana;Barnes;J. Ocean Coastal Econ.,2017
2. Collaborative modelling for informed decision making and inclusive water development;Basco-Carrera;Water Res. Manag.,2017
3. Defining flood zone transitions in low-gradient coastal regions;Bilskie;Geophys. Res. Lett.,2018
4. Improving flood communications in Europe: results from vulnerable and impacted communities;Bradford;Proceedings of the International Symposium on Urban Flood Risk Management,2011
5. CappsA.
Lafayette sues St. Martin, corps of engineers over vermilion river spoil banks removal. Daily Advertiser