Affiliation:
1. Institute for Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Serbia
Abstract
We can define state instability as a situation in which a system's previously established norms and rules no longer function properly. Under the circumstances of changed institutional functioning, the main actors of the given environment resort to new strategies to preserve their authority and maintain their positions. In this paper, we aim to present rhetorical strategies as a response of political actors to the environment of state instability. We will use a qualitative content analysis method to present the three political crises in the United States, Serbia, and Croatia. The paper aims to compare international rhetorical strategies as an attempt by political actors to avoid state instability.
Publisher
Libertas medunarodno sveuciliste
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference29 articles.
1. Aisen, A., & Veiga, F. J. (2013). How does political instability affect economic growth? European Journal of Political Economy, 29, 151-167.
2. Benoit, W. L. (1982). Richard M. Nixon's rhetorical strategies in his public statements on Watergate. Southern Journal of Communication, 47(2), 192-211.
3. Beta, & Nasković, Đ. (2016, Jun 8). Vučić o Savamali: Biće reči i o političkoj odgovornosti. N1. https://rs.n1info.com/vesti/a167197-vucic-o-savamali/
4. Billig, M. (2015). Rhetoric of social psychology. In I. Parker, & J. Shotter (Eds.), Deconstructing Social Psychology (pp. 59-72). Psychology Press.
5. The rhetoric of institutional change;Brown;Organization Studies,2012