Measuring response to treatment in axial spondyloarthritis using quantitative imaging biomarkers: a prospective observational cohort study

Author:

Jones Alexis1,Bray Timothy JP2,Sakai Naomi S2,Bainbridge Alan JP3,Ciurtin Coziana1,Hall-Craggs Margaret A2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Rheumatology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , London, UK

2. Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London , London, UK

3. Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London Hospital , London, UK

Abstract

Objective Objective assessments of disease activity and response to treatment in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) remain a challenge; quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) of inflammation could enhance assessments of disease activity and therapeutic response. We aimed to determine the responsiveness of QIBs obtained from diffusion-weighted imaging (DW-MRI) and chemical shift-encoded MRI (CSE-MRI) using the partially automated Bone Edema and Adiposity Characterisation with Histograms (BEACH) software tool in axSpA patients undergoing biologic therapy. Methods We conducted a prospective longitudinal cohort study, including 30 patients with axSpA undergoing biologic therapy. Patients were scanned before and after biologic therapy using conventional MRI, DWI and CSE-MRI at 3T. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) were assessed using the BEACH tool (https://github.com/TJPBray/BEACH), and conventional MR images were assessed using established visual scoring methods by expert radiologists. Responsiveness – the ability of the MRI measurements to capture changes in disease occurring as a result of biologic therapy – was assessed using the standardized response mean (SRM). Inter-reader reliability of the ADC and PDFF maps was assessed using Bland-Altman limits of agreement analysis and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results Responsiveness to therapy was moderate for ADC-based parameters (SRM 0.50) and comparable to established visual scoring methods for bone marrow oedema (SRM 0.53). Interobserver variability was lower for QIBs compared with conventional visual scores methods. Conclusions QIBs measured using the BEACH tool are sensitive to changes in inflammation in axSpA following biologic therapy, with similar responsiveness and lower interobserver variability to visual scoring by expert radiologists. Advances in knowledge QIBs measured using the partially automated BEACH tool offer an objective measure of response to biologic therapy in axSpA.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3