Can gray values be converted to Hounsfield units? A systematic review

Author:

Eguren Marjorie1,Holguin Anderson2,Diaz Karla3,Vidalon Jose4,Linan Carlos5,Pacheco-Pereira Camila6,Lagravere Vich Manuel Oscar7

Affiliation:

1. Master in Orthodontic Graduate Program, Faculty of Stomatology, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú

2. Program of Orthodontics, Faculty of Stomatology, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú

3. Stomatology Second Specialty, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Lima, Perú

4. Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Stomatology, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú

5. Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Stomatology, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú

6. University of Alberta, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dental Radiology, 11405-87 Ave, Edmonton, Canada

7. University of Alberta, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Orthodontic Graduate Program, ECHA 5-524, 11405-87 Ave, Edmonton, Canada

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this systematic review was to answer the focus question: “Could the gray values (GVs) from CBCT (cone beam computed tomography) be converted to Hounsfield units (HUs) in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT)?” Methods: The included studies try to answer the research question according to the PICO strategy. Studies were gathered by searching several electronic databases and partial grey literature up to January 2021 without language or time restrictions. The methodological assessment of the studies was performed using The Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT) for in vitro studies and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) for in vivo studies. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE system) instrument was applied to assess the level of evidence across the studies. Results: 2710 articles were obtained in Phase 1, and 623 citations remained after removing duplicates. Only three studies were included in this review using a two-phase selection process and after applying the eligibility criteria. All studies were methodologically acceptable, although in general terms with low risks of bias. There are some included studies with quite low and limited evidence estimations and recommendation forces; evidencing the need for clinical studies with diagnostic capacity to support its use. Conclusions: This systematic review demonstrated that the GVs from CBCT cannot be converted to HUs due to the lack of clinical studies with diagnostic capacity to support its use. However, it is evidenced that three conversion steps (equipment calibration, prediction equation models, and a standard formula (converting GVs to HUs)) are needed to obtain pseudo Hounsfield values instead of only obtaining them from a regression or directly from the software.

Publisher

British Institute of Radiology

Subject

General Dentistry,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine,Otorhinolaryngology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3