Mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk in the Saudi population: a case–control study using visual and automated methods

Author:

Aloufi Areej S12ORCID,AlNaeem Abdulrahman N3,Almousa Abeer S3,Hashem Amani M4,Malik Mehreen A4,Altahan Fatina M5,Elsharkawi Mahmoud M5,Almasar Khalid A6,ElMahdy Manal H2,Squires Steven E1,Alzimami Khalid S2,Harkness Elaine F17,Astley Susan M17

Affiliation:

1. Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

2. Department of Radiological Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

3. Department of Women’s Imaging, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

4. Department of Breast Imaging, King Khaled University Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

5. Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

6. Prince Mohammed Medical City, Aljouf, Saudi Arabia

7. Nightingale Breast Screening Centre & Prevent Breast Cancer Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust,, Manchester M23 9LT, UK

Abstract

Objective This study aims to establish risk of breast cancer based on breast density among Saudi women and to compare cancer prediction using different breast density methods. Methods 1140 pseudonymised screening mammograms from Saudi females were retrospectively collected. Breast density was assessed using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) density categories and visual analogue scale (VAS) of 285 cases and 855 controls matched on age and body mass index. In a subset of 160 cases and 480 controls density was estimated by two automated methods, Volpara Density and predicted VAS (pVAS). Odds ratios (ORs) between the highest and second categories in BI-RADS and Volpara density grades, and highest vs lowest quartiles in VAS, pVAS and Volpara Density, were estimated using conditional logistic regression. Results: For BI-RADS, the OR was 6.69 (95% CI 2.79–16.06) in the highest vs second category and OR = 4.78 (95% CI 3.01–7.58) in the highest vs lowest quartile for VAS. In the subset, VAS was the strongest predictor OR = 7.54 (95% CI 3.86–14.74), followed by pVAS using raw images OR = 5.38 (95% CI 2.68–10.77) and Volpara Density OR = 3.55, (95% CI 1.86–6.75) for highest vs lowest quartiles. The matched concordance index for VAS was 0.70 (95% CI 0.65–0.75) demonstrating better discrimination between cases and controls than all other methods. Conclusion Increased mammographic density was strongly associated with risk of breast cancer among Saudi women. Radiologists’ visual assessment of breast density is superior to automated methods. However, pVAS and Volpara Density ™ also significantly predicted breast cancer risk based on breast density. Advances in knowledge Our study established an association between breast density and breast cancer in a Saudi population and compared the performance of automated methods. This provides a stepping-stone towards personalised screening using automated breast density methods.

Publisher

British Institute of Radiology

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3