Interobserver variation in the interpretation of magnetic resonance enterography in Crohn’s disease

Author:

Bhatnagar Gauraang1ORCID,Mallett Sue1,Quinn Laura2,Beable Richard3,Bungay Helen4,Betts Margaret4,Greenhalgh Rebecca5,Gupta Arun6,Higginson Anthony3,Hyland Rachel7,Ilangovan Rajapandian6,Lambie Hannah7,Mainta Evgenia6,Patel Uday6,Pilcher James5,Plumb Andrew1,Porté François6,Sidhu Harbir1,Slater Andrew4,Tolan Damian7,Zealley Ian8,Halligan Steve1,Taylor Stuart1

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Medical Imaging, Charles Bell House, University College London, London, UK

2. Institute of Applied Health Research, NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

3. Department of Radiology, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK

4. Department of Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK

5. Department of Radiology, St George’s University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK

6. Intestinal Imaging Centre, St Mark’s Hospital, LNWUH NHS Trust, Harrow, UK

7. Department of Radiology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK

8. Department of Radiology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate interobserver variability for diagnosis of disease presence and extent of small bowel and colonic Crohn’s disease using MR enterography (MRE) Methods: Data from the first 73 consecutive patients (mean age 32, 33F, 28 new diagnosis, 45 suspected relapse) recruited to a multicentre, prospective diagnostic accuracy trial evaluating MRE for small bowel Crohn’s disease were each read independently by three (from a pool of 20) radiologists. Radiologists documented presence and segmental location of small bowel Crohn’s disease and recorded morphological mural/extramural parameters for involved segments. Per patient percentage agreement for disease presence and extent were calculated against an outcome-based construct reference standard (averaged between pairs of readers). Prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted κ (PABAK) was calculated. Results: Agreement for small bowel disease presence for new diagnosis/relapsed patients was 68%(κ = 0.36)/ 78% (κ = 0.56) and 43%(κ = 0.14)/ 53% for disease extent (κ = 0.07), respectively. For disease presence, all three radiologists agreed correctly with the reference standard in 41/59 (69%) of patients with small bowel involvement, and in 8/14 (57%) cases of without small bowel disease. Agreement was highest for multisegment disease, greater than 5 cm in length, with mural thickness>6 mm, and increased mural T2 signal. Agreement for colonic disease presence was 61% (κ = 0.21 fair agreement) for new diagnosis/ 60% (κ = 0.20, slight agreement) for relapsed patients. Conclusion: There is a reasonable agreement between radiologists for small bowel disease presence using MRE for newly diagnosed Crohn’s disease, and patients with suspected relapse, respectively. Agreement is lower for disease extent. Advances in knowledge: There is reasonable agreement between radiologists for small bowel disease presence using MRE for newly diagnosed (68%) Crohn’s disease, and patients with suspected relapse (78%). Agreement is lower for disease extent (43% new diagnosis and 53% suspected relapse).

Publisher

British Institute of Radiology

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3