The diagnostic performance of CESM and CE-MRI in evaluating the pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Objectives: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is an important method for breast cancer treatment. By monitoring its pathological response, the selection of clinical treatment strategies can be guided. In this study, the meta-analysis was used to compare the accuracy of contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) in detecting the pathological response of NAC. Methods: Literatures associated to CE-MRI and CESM in the evaluation of pathological response of NAC were searched from PubMed, Cochrane Library, web of science, and EMBASE databases. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the quality of studies. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the SROC curve were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CE-MRI and CESM in monitoring the pathological response of NAC. Results: There were 24 studies involved, 18 of which only underwent CE-MRI examination, three of which only underwent CESM examination, and three of which underwent both CE-MRI and CESM examination. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CE-MRI were 0.77 (95%CI, 0.67–0.84) and 0.82 (95%CI, 0.73–0.89), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CESM were 0.83 (95%CI, 0.66–0.93) and 0.82 (95%CI, 0.68–0.91), respectively. The AUCs of SROC curve for CE-MRI and CESM were 0.86 and 0.89, respectively. Conclusions: Compared to CE-MRI, CESM has equal specificity, greater sensitivity and excellent performance, which may have a brighter prospect in evaluating the pathological response of breast cancer to NAC. Advances in knowledge: CESM showed equal specificity, greater sensitivity, and excellent performance than CE-MRI.