The influence of small field output factors simulated uncertainties on the calculated dose in VMAT plans for brain metastases: a multicentre study

Author:

Clemente Stefania1,Falco Maria Daniela2,Cagni Elisabetta3,Talamonti Cinzia4,Boccia Mafalda5,Gino Eva6,Lorenzini Elena7,Rosica Federica8,Russo Serenella9,Alparone Alessandro10,Zefiro Daniele11,Fiandra Christian12

Affiliation:

1. Unit of Medical Physics and Radioprotection, Federico II University Hospital, Napoli, Italy

2. Department of Radiation Oncology, “G. D’Annunzio” University, “SS. Annunziata” Hospital, Chieti, Italy

3. Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy

4. Medical Physics Unit, University Of Florence, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy

5. Polydiagnostic Center Check - Up S.r.l, Salerno, Italy

6. Medical PhysicDepartment, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin, Italy

7. U.O.C Fisica Sanitaria Area Nord, Azienda USL Nord Ovest Toscana, Massa Carrara, Italy

8. U.O.C. Fisica Sanitaria, ASL di Teramo, Italy

9. Medical Physics Unit, AUSL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy

10. R&D Department, Tecnologie Avanzate, Turin, Italy

11. MedicaPhysics Unit, ASL5 Sistema Sanitario Regione Liguria, La Spezia, Italy

12. Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Abstract

Objectives: This multicentric study was carried out to investigate the impact of small field output factors (OFs) inaccuracies on the calculated dose in volumetric arctherapy (VMAT) radiosurgery brain plans. Methods: Nine centres, realised the same five VMAT plans with common planning rules and their specific clinical equipment Linac/treatment planning system commissioned with their OFs measured values (OFbaseline). In order to simulate OFs errors, two new OFs sets were generated for each centre by changing only the OFs values of the smallest field sizes (from 3.2 × 3.2 cm2 to 1 × 1 cm2) with well-defined amounts (positive and negative). Consequently, two virtual machines for each centre were recommissioned using the new OFs and the percentage dose differences ΔD (%) between the baseline plans and the same plans recalculated using the incremented (OFup) and decremented (OFdown) values were evaluated. The ΔD (%) were analysed in terms of planning target volume (PTV) coverage and organs at risk (OARs) sparing at selected dose/volume points. Results: The plans recalculated with OFdown sets resulted in higher variation of doses than baseline within 1.6 and 3.4% to PTVs and OARs respectively; while the plans with OFup sets resulted in lower variation within 1.3% to both PTVs and OARs. Our analysis highlights that OFs variations affect calculated dose depending on the algorithm and on the delivery mode (field jaw/MLC‐defined). The Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm resulted significantly more sensitive to OFs variations than all of the other algorithms. Conclusion: The aim of our study was to evaluate how small fields OFs inaccuracies can affect the dose calculation in VMAT brain radiosurgery treatments plans. It was observed that simulated OFs errors, return dosimetric calculation accuracies within the 3% between concurrent plans analysed in terms of percentage dose differences at selected dose/volume points of the PTV coverage and OARs sparing. Advances in knowledge: First multicentre study involving different Planning/Linacs about undetectable errors in commissioning output factor for small fields.

Publisher

British Institute of Radiology

Subject

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Reference35 articles.

1. Current status of cranial stereotactic radiosurgery in the UK

2. Technological quality requirements for stereotactic radiotherapy

3. Small fields: Nonequilibrium radiation dosimetry

4. A new formalism for reference dosimetry of small and nonstandard fields

5. International atomic energy agency, dosimetry of small static fields used in external beam radiotherapy, technical reports series No. 483. IAEA 2017;

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3