Affiliation:
1. University of Winchester
Abstract
The article explores how Zygmunt Bauman's work from Modernity and the Holocaust to his liquid turn writings assumes that people live in a deterministic world. Bauman fails to distinguish agency as an analytical category in its own right and as such fails to capture self-determination, agential control and moral responsibility. All of Bauman's work is based upon the assumption that the individual loses their autonomy and the ability to judge the moral content of their actions because of adiaphortic processes external to themselves as individuals giving rise to agentic state in which the individual is unable to exercise their agency. In contrast to the argument in Modernity and the Holocaust this article suggests that the Nazis developed a distinct communitarian ethical code rooted in self-control that encouraged individuals to overcome their personal feeling states, enabling them to engage in acts of cruelty to people defined as outside of the community. In his post-2000 work where the emphasis is on the process of liquefaction there is the same undervaluing of human agency in the face of external forces reflected in Bauman's concepts of ambivalence, fate and swarm.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Barbarism – The Active Dystopia;Studia Litteraria et Historica;2023-10-23
2. Retracted article: Barbarism – The Active Dystopia;Studia Litteraria et Historica;2023-10-23
3. Visual representations of modernity in documents from the Łódź Ghetto;Revisiting Modernity and the Holocaust;2022-02-14
4. Warsaw Jews in the face of the Holocaust;Revisiting Modernity and the Holocaust;2022-02-14
5. From understanding victims to victims' understanding;Revisiting Modernity and the Holocaust;2022-02-14