RISK MANAGEMENT PRACTICES OF ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL BANKS OF PAKISTAN: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Author:

Bashir Rubina1,Azeez A. A.2

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka

2. Faculty of Management and Finance, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka

Abstract

This paper is the report of a study that has investigated the impact of the risk management process, including liquidity and operational risk, on the risk management practices of Islamic banks and conventional banks in Pakistan. The study compared the risk management practices of both types of banks. Data was collected through the 200 self- administered questionnaires distributed to senior managers and risk officials of both types of banks. The data was analyzed using basic descriptive statistics, One-way ANOVA and Multiple regression analysis. The empirical results showed that risk assessment and analysis, risk monitoring and liquidity risk analysis were the most influential determinants of the risk management practices of conventional banks, whereas risk identification, risk assessment and analysis, credit risk analysis, liquidity risk analysis and operational risk analysis had influenced the risk management practices of Islamic banks. Overall, Islamic banks were better in terms of understanding risk management, risk identification, risk assessment and analysis, risk monitoring and operational risk analysis, while conventional banks were ahead of Islamic banks in credit risk analysis, liquidity risk analysis, and risk management practices. In the context of the emerging economy of Pakistan, the study outcomes can be helpful for investors, potential and existing customers to make prudent investment decisions. Findings are also helpful for strategy managers and regulators in policy formulation, elevation, and implementation of risk management regulations.

Publisher

UUM Press, Universiti Utara Malaysia

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference56 articles.

1. Abu Hussain, H., & Al-Ajmi, J. (2012). Risk management practices of conventional and Islamic banks in Bahrain. The Journal of Risk Finance, 13(3), 215-239.

2. Abdullah, M., Shahimi, S., & Ghafar Ismail, A. (2011). Operational risk in Islamic banks: Examination of issues. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 3(2), 131-151.

3. Akhtar, M., Ali, K., & Sadaqat, S., (2011). Liquidity risk Management: A comparative study between Conventional and Islamic Banks of Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business, 1(1), 35-44.

4. Al Ali, H., & Naysary, B. (2014). Risk management practices in Islamic banks in Kuwait. Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance, 2(1), 123-148.

5. Alam, M. Z., & Musukujjaman, M. (2011). Risk management practices: A critical diagnosis of some selected commercial banks in Bangladesh. Journal of Business and Technology (Dhaka), 6(1), 15-35.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3