Assessment of Nursing Skill and Knowledge of ChatGPT, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, and Llama: A Comparative Study

Author:

Dilan S. Hiwa ,Sarhang Sedeeq Abdalla ,Aso S. Muhialdeen ,Hussein M. Hamasalih ,Sanaa O. Karim

Abstract

Introduction Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force in healthcare. This study assesses the performance of advanced AI systems—ChatGPT-3.5, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, and Llama 2—in a comprehensive 100-question nursing competency examination. The objective is to gauge their potential contributions to nursing healthcare education and future potential implications. Methods The study tested four AI systems (ChatGPT 3.5, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, Llama 2) with a 100-question nursing exam in February of 2024. A standardized protocol was employed to administer the examination, covering diverse nursing competencies. Questions derived from reputable clinical manuals ensured content reliability. The AI systems underwent evaluation based on accuracy rates. Results Microsoft Copilot demonstrated the highest accuracy at 84%, followed by ChatGPT 3.5 (77%), Gemini (75%), and Llama 2 (68%). None achieved complete accuracy on all questions. Each of the AI systems has answered at least one question that only they got correctly. Conclusion The variations in AI answers underscore the significance of selecting appropriate AI systems based on specific application requirements and domains, as no singular AI system consistently surpassed others in every aspect of nursing knowledge.

Publisher

Barw Medical Journal

Reference18 articles.

1. Kuzucu 1. Ray PP. ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003

2. 2. Ahamed ZM, Dhahir HM, Mohammed MM, Ali R, Hassan SH, Muhialdeen AS, Saeed YA, Fatah ML, Qaradakhy AJ, Ali RM, Ahmed SF. Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Human Decision-Making in Thyroid and Neck Swellings: A Case-Based Study. Barw Medical Journal. 2023;1(4):2-6. doi:10.58742/bmj.v1i2.43

3. 3. Masalkhi M, Ong J, Waisberg E, Lee AG. Google DeepMind’s gemini AI versus ChatGPT: a comparative analysis in ophthalmology. Eye. 2024 14:1-6. doi:10.1038/s41433-024-02958-w

4. 4. Abbas YN, Hassan HA, Hamad DQ, Hasan SJ, Omer DA, Kakamad SH, et al. Role of ChatGPT and Google Bard in the Diagnosis of Psychiatric Disorders: A Cross Sectional Study. Barw Medical Journal. 2023;1(4):14-19. doi:10.58742/4vd6h741

5. 5. Semeraro F, Gamberini L, Carmona F, Monsieurs KG. Clinical questions on advanced life support answered by artificial intelligence. A comparison between ChatGPT, Google Bard and Microsoft Copilot. Resuscitation. 2024 1;195. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110114

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3