1. 1. Adams, G.P., Kastelic, J.P., Bergfelt, D.R., and Ginther, O.J. 1987. Effect of uterine inflammation and ultrasonically-detected uterine pathology on fertility in the mare. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 35: 445–454.
2. 2. Brinsko, S.P., Rigby, S.L., Varner, D.D., and Blanchard, T.L. 2003. A practical method for recognizing mares susceptible to post-breeding endometritis. Proc. Annual Convention of the Am. Assoc. Equine Prac. 49: 363−365.
3. 3. Burleson, M.D., LeBlanc, M.M., Riddle, W.T., and Hendericks, K.E.M. 2010. Endometrial microbial isolates are associated with different ultrasonographic and endometrial cytology findings in thoroughbred mares. Proc. Annual Convention of the Am. Assoc. Equine Prac. 56: 317.
4. 4. Christoffersen, M., Woodward, E., Bojesen, A.M., Jacobsen, S., Petersen, M.R., Troedsson, M.H.T., and Lehn-Jensen, H. 2012. Inflammatory responses to induced infectious endometritis in mares resistant or susceptible to persistent endometritis. BMC Vet. Res. 8: 41.
5. 5. Diel de Amorim, M., Gartley, C.J., Foster, R.A., Hill, A., Scholtz, E.L., Hayes, A., and Chenier, T.S. 2016. Comparison of clinical signs, endometrial culture, endometrial cytology, uterine low-volume lavage, and uterine biopsy and combinations in the diagnosis of equine endometritis. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 44: 54–61.