Investigating Construction Activity, Using Network Analysis Like the Critical Path Method (CMP)

Author:

Muhammad Sadis Isa ,Bilkisu Maijamaa ,Babagana Modu

Abstract

Managing construction work is the process of breaking down the structures of the construction, determining the relationship between each activity to be carried out, the duration that is needed for every activity, and the creation of a schedule that is flexible. Problems might crop up in most constructions such as an increase in the cost of the project, the project not being finished at the stipulated time (schedule slippage), limitation of resources, and so on. The aim of this study is to investigate a network construction at Keffi new market, using the critical path method, this study will investigate the time of completion of a project and estimate the earliest and shortest time needed to complete the project, identifying the critical and non-critical task activity, data collection from project supervisor at Canonic Consult Ltd. Considering activities such as identification of all the activities necessary for the project construction, precedence relationship within the stated task, development of the network diagram, estimation of the earliest start time (EST) and latest start time (LST), determining the task that is critical and non-critical to timely completion of the project (float task). The outcome of the study shows that the expected completion time for the project is approximately 10 weeks, exactly 67 days and the critical activities are Foundation, Electrical & Plumbing, Floor, and Landscaping. The Noncritical activities are Site Clearance, Setting-out, Columns, Framework, Brick masonry, Roof structure, Plastering, Door & window fixation, Painting, and Electrical fittings and their “total float” is 19,17, 18, 28, 19, 17, 32, 28, 32, 28 and 22 days respectively.

Publisher

Lloyd Business School

Reference19 articles.

1. Adibhesami, M. A., Ekhlassi, A., Mosadeghrad, A. M., & Mohebifar, A. (2019). Improving time-cost balance in critical path method (CPM) using Dragonfly Algorithm (DA). International Journal of Industrial Engineering & Production Research, 30(2), 187-194.

2. Andiyan, A., Putra, R. M., Rembulan, G. D., & Tannady, H. (2021, June). Construction project evaluation using CPM-Crashing, CPM-PERT, and CCPM for minimize project delays. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1933, No. 1, p. 012096). IOP Publishing.

3. Dorfeshan, Y., Mousavi, S. M., Mohagheghi, V., & Vahdani, B. (2018). Selecting project-critical path by a new interval type-2 fuzzy decision methodology based on MULTIMOORA, MOOSRA and TPOP methods. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 120, 160-178.

4. Hegazy, T., &Ersahin, T. (2001). Simplified spreadsheet solutions. II: Overall schedule optimization. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(6), 469-475.

5. Kusumadarma, I. A., Pratami, D., Yasa, I. P., & Tripiawan, W. (2020). Developing project schedule in telecommunication projects using critical path method (CPM). International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 12(3), 60-67.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3