Quality of Life in Smart Cities: A Research on Smart City Practices of Sakarya Metro-politan Municipality
-
Published:2022-09-27
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1302-1761
-
Container-title:Bilgi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
-
language:tr
-
Short-container-title:bilgisosyal
Affiliation:
1. SAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SİYASAL BİLGİLER FAKÜLTESİ, ÇALIŞMA EKONOMİSİ VE ENDÜSTRİ İLİŞKİLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, ÇALIŞMA EKONOMİSİ ANABİLİM DALI
Abstract
Purpose - This study sought to settle the question, “How can smart city strategies contribute to improving the urban quality of life?”
Methodology/Approach/Design - Sakarya Metropolitan Municipa-lity (SMM) was found worthy of this single case study since it has become the very first to prepare a smart city strategy and action plan among local governments in Turkey. In addition to face-to-face in-terviews with 23 personnel holding various positions within SMM, the municipality’s strategic plan (SASEP) and official news bulletin (Gündüz-Gece) were subjected to content analysis. During this field research, the observation notes were utilized to interpret the findings of the content analysis.
Findings - The findings revealed that SMM adopts a data-driven smart city strategy. It was also discovered that, thanks to this stra-tegy, SMM provided an improvement primarily in the objective qua-lity of life indicators of the city, particularly visible in smart city indi-cators such as infrastructure, transportation, environment, and go-vernance.
Originality/Value - Based on the extensive literature review and empirical findings, the concept “smart city” was brought a definition as “a city management strategy that addresses the internal dynamics of the city and makes use of technological developments, various da-ta sources, and the knowledge obtained by deploying an appropriate process to improve the quality of life of its stakeholders in line with the priorities.”
Publisher
Degisim Yayinlari
Reference61 articles.
1. Ardito, L., Ferraris, A., Petruzzelli, A. M., Bresciani, S., Giudi-ce, M. D. (2019). “The Role of Universities in the Knowledge Management of Smart City Projects”, Technological Forecas-ting&Social Change, c.142, ss.312–321. 2. Baldock, J. C. (2014). “Social Policy, Social Welfare, and the Welfare State”, Baldock, J., C., Manning, N., Vickerstaff, S. (ed.), Social Policy, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, ss.8–26. 3. Bawa, M., Caganova, D., Szilva, I. (2016). “Importance of Inter-net of Things and Big Data in Building Smart City and What Would Be Its Challenges”, Leon-Garicia, A., vd. (ed.), Smart City 360°, Toronto: Springer, ss.605–616. 4. Bronstein, Z. (2009). “Industry and the Smart City”, Dissent, c.56(3), ss.27–34. 5. Bunders, D. J. ve Varró, K. (2019). “Problematizing Data-Driven Urban Practices: Insights from Five Dutch Smart Cities”, Ci-ties, c.93, ss.145–152.
|
|