No Benefit for Consensus Double Reading at Baseline Screening for Lung Cancer with the Use of Semiautomated Volumetry Software-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

No Benefit for Consensus Double Reading at Baseline Screening for Lung Cancer with the Use of Semiautomated Volumetry Software

Published:2012-01 Issue:1 Volume:262 Page:320-326
ISSN:0033-8419
Container-title:Radiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Radiology

Author:

Wang Ying,van Klaveren Rob J.,de Bock Geertruida H.,Zhao Yingru,Vernhout René,Leusveld Anne,Scholten Ernst,Verschakelen Johny,Mali Willem,de Koning Harry,Oudkerk Matthijs

Publisher

Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Link

http://pubs.rsna.org/doi/pdf/10.1148/radiol.11102289

Reference31 articles.

1. Variability in Radiologists' Interpretations of Mammograms

2. Accuracy of Screening Mammography Using Single Versus Independent Double Interpretation

3. Performance Parameters for Screening and Diagnostic Mammography: Specialist and General Radiologists

4. The efficacy of double reading mammograms in breast screening

5. Second reading of screening mammograms increases cancer detection and recall rates. Results in the Florence screening programme

Cited by 26 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Detection and size quantification of pulmonary nodules in ultralow-dose versus regular-dose CT: a comparative study in COPD patients;The British Journal of Radiology;2023-04-01

2. The Potential Role of Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography;Diagnostics;2022-10-08

3. The role of computer-assisted radiographer reporting in lung cancer screening programmes;European Radiology;2022-05-14

4. Use of “Diagnostic Yield” in Imaging Research Reports: Results from Articles Published in Two General Radiology Journals;Korean Journal of Radiology;2022

5. Screening for Lung Cancer With Low-Dose Computed Tomography;JAMA;2021-03-09