Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Beliefs and Stated Attitudes About Oral Corrective Feedback

Author:

Aydın Hale Ülkü1ORCID,Özmen Kemal Sinan2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. TED ÜNİVERSİTESİ

2. GAZI UNIVERSITY

Abstract

This study aims to investigate novice and experienced teachers’ stated beliefs and attitudes about oral corrective feedback (OCF) and the similarities and differences between them. Certain qualitative and quantitative research techniques were employed in this study to answer the research questions. Regarding qualitative design, some interviews were conducted to find out novice and experienced teachers’ stated beliefs about OCF. The quantitative part of the study is based on data collected through Situations for Error Correction (SEC) Simulation. The novice and experienced teachers were asked to write how they would respond to each situation and why they would respond that way. The aim of this tool was to identify the novice and experienced teachers’ stated attitudes. The results indicated that although there were some similarities between the novice and experienced teachers’ beliefs and attitudes about OCF, their OCF strategies and beliefs varied regarding correcting errors concerning language components.

Publisher

Gazi Egitim Faukeltesi Dergisi

Reference37 articles.

1. Annett, J. (1969). Feedback and human behaviour: The effects of knowledge of results, incentives and reinforcement on learning and performance. Penguin Books.

2. Bailey, K. M. (1996). The best laid plans: Teachers’ in-class decisions to depart from their lesson plans. Voices from the Language Classroom, 15-40.

3. Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S., & Ellis, R. (2004). Teachers' stated beliefs about incidental focus on form and their classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 243-272. doi:10.1093/applin/25.2.243

4. Borg, S. (2015). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. Bloomsbury Publishing.

5. Brians, P. (2003). Common errors in English usage. Franklin, Beedle & Associates, Inc..

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3