Affiliation:
1. Department of Enterprise “Mario Lucertini”, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Viale del Politecnico, 1, 00133 Rome, Italy
Abstract
The reliable exchange of data is a crucial issue for the loose coupling of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and computational structural mechanics (CSM) modules in fluid–structure interaction (FSI) applications. This paper presents a comparison between two methods for mapping the traction field across mismatching grids, namely the RIBES method and the preCICE algorithm, both based on radial basis function (RBF) interpolation. The two methods demonstrate different degrees of control over balance preservation during mapping, with the RIBES algorithm exhibiting greater efficacy. Test benches are a parametric double curved geometry and a wind tunnel mock-up. In this second case, forces from mapping are used to load a CSM model to retrieve stress and displacement fields. Differences in FEM results are appreciable although not significant, showing a correlation between the accuracy of balance preservation during data mapping and the structural output.
Reference52 articles.
1. Fluid-structure interaction modelling of wind turbines: Simulating the full machine;Hsu;Comput. Mech.,2012
2. A framework for stabilized partitioned analysis of thin-membrane-wind interaction;Wuchner;Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids,2007
3. Stein, K., Benney, R., Kalro, V., Johnson, A., Tezduyar, T., Stein, K., Benney, R., Kalro, V., Johnson, A., and Tezduyar, T. (1997, January 3–5). Parallel computation of parachute fluid-structure interactions. Proceedings of the 14th Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA.
4. Provably second-order time-accurate loosely-coupled solution algorithms for transient nonlinear computational aeroelasticity;Farhat;Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.,2006
5. Multiphysics simulations: Challenges and opportunities;Keyes;Int. J. High. Perform. Comput. Appl.,2013