Abstract
Background: Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) can successfully reduce volumetric ridge changes. However, there is still no consensus on what technique is the most advantageous for each specific clinical scenario. Hence, the aim of the present paper was to provide a treatment decision tree to guide the choice of predictable ARP procedures based on extraction socket buccal bone morphology and integrity. Material and Methods: Three socket types (ST) are proposed and discussed based on buccal bone morphology (intact, dehiscence or fenestration). Results: A decision tree for ARP was developed in order to merge ST classification with suitable treatment modalities. In the decision tree, the issue of when to allow unassisted healing or ARP was discussed. Described methods included bone grafting and collagen plug, and absorbable membrane or non-resorbable membrane, with or without flap elevation. Conclusion: A decision tree for ARP procedures was provided to guide clinicians towards the most conservative and predictable treatment approach based on remaining socket anatomical structures after extraction.
Subject
General Materials Science
Reference50 articles.
1. Bone healing following immediate versus delayed placement of titanium implants into extraction sockets: A prospective clinical study;Schropp;Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants,2003
2. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog
3. The Effects of Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Meta-Analysis
4. Ridge preservation techniques to avoid invasive bone reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis: Naples Consensus Report Working Group C;Barootchi;Int. J. Oral Implantol.,2019
5. Bone Healing after Tooth Extraction with or without an Intervention: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献