Affiliation:
1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 27272, United Arab Emirates
2. Department of Public Works Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
3. Department of Civil Engineering, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan
Abstract
Over time, roads undergo deterioration caused by various factors such as traffic loads, climate conditions, and material properties. Considering the substantial global investments in road construction, it is crucial to periodically assess and implement maintenance and rehabilitation (M and R) plans to ensure the network’s acceptable level of service. An integral component of the M and R plan involves utilizing performance prediction models, especially for rutting distress, a significant issue in asphalt pavement. This study aimed to develop rutting prediction models using data from the Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) database, employing several machine learning techniques such as regression tree (RT), support vector machine (SVM), ensembles, Gaussian process regression (GPR), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). These techniques are well-known for effectively handling extensive and complex datasets. To achieve the highest modeling accuracy, the parameters of each model were meticulously fine-tuned. Upon evaluation, the results revealed that the GPR models outperformed other techniques in various metrics, including Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), R-squared, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Mean Square Error (MSE). The best GPR model achieved an RMSE of 1.96, R-squared of 0.70, MAE of 1.32, and MSE of 109.33, indicating its superior predictive capabilities compared with the other machine learning methods tested in this study. Comparison Analysis was made for 10 randomly selected sections on our novel machine learning model that outperforms existing models, with an R2 of 0.989 compared with 0.303 and 0.3095 for other models. This demonstrates the potential of advanced machine learning in accurate rut depth prediction across diverse climates, aiding pavement management decisions.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference64 articles.
1. Pavement management systems–past, present, and future;Finn;Public Roads,1998
2. TRIP (2016). The Interstate Highway System Turns 60: Challenges to Its Ability to Continue to Save Lives, Time and Money, TRIP.
3. ASCE (2017). 2017 Infrastructure Report Card, ASCE.
4. Haas, R., Hudson, W.R., and Falls, L.C. (2015). Pavement Asset Management, Scrivener Publishing with John Wiley & Sons.
5. Zimmerman, K.A., and Testa, D.M. (2023, July 22). An Evaluation of Idaho Transportation Department Needs for Maintenance Management and Pavement Management Software Tools. Available online: https://trid.trb.org/view/915599.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献