Affiliation:
1. Applied Science and Technology Department, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy
2. Architecture and Design Department, Politecnico di Torino, 10125 Turin, Italy
3. Department of Structural, Geotechnical and Building Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy
Abstract
Concrete is one of the world’s most used and produced materials, based on its dominant role in the construction sector, both for the construction of new structures and for the repair, restoration, and retrofitting of built ones. Recently, research has been focused on the development of innovative solutions to extend the service life of reinforced concrete structures, specifically by introducing self-healing properties aimed at reducing the necessary maintenance interventions and, consequently, the environmental impacts. These solutions imply costs and financial feasibility impacts, which must be measured and evaluated to support the ranking of preferable alternatives. Thus, this paper proposes a methodology capable of supporting the selection of material/product options from the early design stages in the construction sector. Assuming a life-cycle perspective, the Life-Cycle Costing (LCC) approach is proposed for comparing three material solutions applied to the case study of a wall component hypothesized to be used in building construction in Turin, Northern Italy. Namely, traditional standard concrete and two different self-healing concrete types were evaluated using the Global Cost calculation of each solution. The focus is on the material service life as a crucial factor, capable of orienting investment decisions given its effects on the required maintenance activities (and related investments) and the obtainable residual value. Thus, according to a performance approach, LCC is combined with the Factor Method (FM). Assuming the capability of the lifespan to affect the Global Cost calculation, the results give full evidence of the potential benefits due to the use of self-healing materials in construction in terms of the reduction in maintenance costs, the increase in the durability of buildings and structures and related residual values, and consequently, the reduction in the environmental impacts.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference85 articles.
1. (2023, May 10). EUROPA. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/construction_demolition.htm.
2. (2023, May 10). Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on Waste and Repealing Certain Directives. Official Journal of the European Union, 2008. Current Consolidated Version: 5 July 2018. Available online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32008L0098.
3. Self-Healing in Cementitious Materials—A Review;Materials,2013
4. A review of the efficiency of self-healing concrete technologies for durable and sustainable concrete under realistic conditions;Cappellesso;Int. Mater. Rev.,2023
5. Early-Age Self-Healing of Cementitious Materials Containing Ground Granulated Blast-Furnace Slag under Water Curing;Olivier;J. Adv. Concr. Technol.,2016