Social Life Cycle Assessment of a Coffee Production Management System in a Rural Area: A Regional Evaluation of the Coffee Industry in West Java, Indonesia
-
Published:2023-09-17
Issue:18
Volume:15
Page:13834
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Rahmah Devi Maulida1ORCID, Purnomo Dwi1, Filianty Fitry1, Ardiansah Irfan1ORCID, Pramulya Rahmat2ORCID, Noguchi Ryozo3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Agricultural Industrial Technology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 40132, Indonesia 2. Faculty of Agriculture, Teuku Umar University, Meulaboh 23681, Indonesia 3. Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
Abstract
The demand for coffee in the local and global markets has encouraged massive production at upstream and downstream levels. The socioeconomic impact of coffee production still presents an issue, primarily related to the social benefit and economic value added for farmers. This study aims to identify the social impact of the coffee industry in rural areas in three different coffee industry management systems. Many coffee industries exist in rural areas, with various management systems: farmer group organizations, middlemen, and smallholder private coffee production. This study performed the social organization life cycle assessment to identify the social impact of the coffee industry in rural areas according to the management systems. The results indicated that the coffee industry managed by farmers is superior in providing a positive social impact to four stakeholders: workers, the local community, society, and suppliers, as indicated by the highest social impact scores of 0.46 for the workers, 0.8 for the local community, 0.54 for society, and 0.615 for the suppliers. The private coffee industry provides the highest social impact to consumers (0.43), and the middlemen were very loyal to the shareholders, with a total social impact score of 0.544. According to this social sustainability index analysis, the coffee industry managed by the farmer group has the highest endpoint of social impact at 0.64, which is categorized as the “sustainable” status. Meanwhile, the coffee industry managed by private companies and middlemen is categorized as “neutral or sufficient”. The coffee industry should implement improvement strategies to increase their social impact to all stakeholders in their business supply chain.
Funder
Internal Padjadjaran University Research Grant under the scheme “Riset Kompetensi Dosen Unpad (RKDU)” Directorate of Research and Community Engagement, Universitas Padjadjaran
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference39 articles.
1. Rahmah, D.M., Mardawati, E., Pujianto, T., Kastaman, R., and Pramulya, R. (2023). Coffee Pulp Biomass Utilization on Coffee Production and Its Impact on Energy Saving, CO2 Emission Reduction, and Economic Value Added to Promote Green Lean Practice in Agriculture Production. Agronomy, 13. 2. A model calculation of the carbon footprint of agricultural products: The case of Slovenia;Jejcic;Energy,2017 3. Sustainability assessment of rice production systems in Mazandaran Province, Iran with emergy analysis and fuzzy logic;Amini;Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess.,2020 4. GHG and cattle farming: CO-assessing the emissions and economic performances in Italy;Fiore;J. Clean. Prod.,2018 5. Nowak, A., Krukowski, A., and Różańska-Boczula, M. (2019). Assessment of sustainability in agriculture of the European Union countries. Agronomy, 9.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|