Affiliation:
1. Department of Economics, University of Piraeus, 80 Karaoli and Dimitriou St., 18534 Piraeus, Greece
2. Department of Accounting and Finance, School of Economics, Business and Computer Science, Neapolis University Pafos, Paphos 8042, Cyprus
3. Department of Accounting and Finance, Hellenic Meditarenean University, 71410 Heraclion, Greece
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the influential factors of Federal Housing Administration (FHA) mortgage loans, focusing our research interest on peer-to-peer (P2P) lending, the most successful FinTech lending model. We consider P2P lending an alternative source of financing that marginal borrowers use to pay the increased mortgage down payment, making them eligible to receive a mortgage from conventional banks. In other words, we examine whether and to what extent P2P lending has a positive impact on the FHA loans volume by providing the ability to circumvent the loan-to-value (LTV) cap policy. As a result, P2P lending can be seen as a means for ”rationed” borrowers to have access to the market by reducing inequalities and promoting financial inclusion, thus achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We employ hand-collected data from FHA mortgages, P2P loans, and other economic factors from all 50 U.S. states during 2007–2017 and use panel data techniques for this purpose. Research shows that P2P lending, GDP per capita, population growth, broad money growth rate, interest rate, unemployment rate, new housing units, and consumer confidence Index produce effects on FHA loans. We show that P2P lending, a nonconventional determinant, is causally associated with a significant increase in the count and volume of FHA loans, implying that P2P lending has a positive impact on them. The ability of P2P to bypass mortgage supply constraints (tightened LTV caps) by providing small loans to borrowers to meet the increased down payment requirements is very important to policy-makers, as it shows that constraining the volume of mortgage loans may be not achieved. Macroprudential tools designed to control credit growth may prove ineffective, as the use of alternative forms of lending helps circumvent them and ultimately leads to excessive household leverage with all the risks that it poses to the financial system.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference54 articles.
1. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) (2021, June 29). A Look at the FHA’s Evolving Market Shares by Race and Ethnicity, Available online: https://www.huduser.gov/portal/periodicals/ushmc/spring11/ch1.pdf.
2. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) (2021, June 29). Fiscal Year 2018 Independent Actuarial Review of the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund: Cash Flow Net Present Value from Forward Mortgage Insurance-In-Force, Available online: https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/Housing/documents/ActuarialMMIFForward2018.pdf.
3. LTV policy as a macroprudential tool and its effects on residential mortgage loans;Morgan;J. Financ. Intermediat.,2019
4. Loan-to-value policy and housing loans: Effects on constrained borrowers;Araujo;J. Financ. Intermediat.,2020
5. Wong, E., Fong, T., Li, K.-F., and Choi, H. (2021, June 29). Loan-to-Value Ratio as a Macro-Prudential Tool–Hong Kong’s Experience and Cross-Country Evidence 2011. Hong Kong Monetary Authority Working Paper. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1768546.