Affiliation:
1. College of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
2. School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China
3. School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
Abstract
Over the past decades, resource-based cities have played a significant role in the development of countries worldwide. China, as a representative developing country, has seen the vital role played by resource-based cities in its development progress. However, heavy reliance on resources in these cities leads to environmental issues. The challenge lies in achieving ecological innovation and enhancing residents’ well-being within resource and environmental constraints for sustainable regional development. This study introduces a two-stage super slacks-based measure (super-SBM) approach to assess the ecological efficiency (EE), ecological innovation (EI), and residents’ well-being (RW) efficiency of 92 sample resource-based cities in China, and presents spatial and grouping comparisons. Then, the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis method (fsQCA) is applied to identify paths and development orientations for sustainable development. The results show that resource-based cities in southwest and northwest China exhibit strong performance in EE, EI, and RW, while those in the northeast perform poorly. Growth and maturity resource-based cities demonstrate favorable development in EE and EI, whereas recession and regeneration resource-based cities show unsatisfactory development. The RW efficiency tends to stabilize after the rapid growth of the 92 sample resource-based cities. The fsQCA reveals five paths to achieving high EE, three paths for high EI efficiency, and two paths for high RW efficiency. These paths can be categorized into four development orientations: scale-oriented, economic-oriented, integrated-oriented, and transformation-oriented. These results provide essential references for the development planning and strategic formulation not only in China but also in other similar resource-based cities globally.
Funder
Humanities and Social Science Planning Fund of the Ministry of Education
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference66 articles.
1. The International Energy Agency (2023, August 15). Data and Statistics of International Energy Agency. Available online: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics?country=WORLD&fuel=Energy%20supply&indicator=Total%.
2. The International Energy Agency (2023, August 15). CO2 Emissions in 2022. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/co2-emissions-in-2022.
3. The impact of air pollution on deaths, disease burden, and life expectancy across the states of India: The Global Burden of Disease Study 2017;Balakrishnan;Lancet Planet. Health,2019
4. Mortality risk and PM2.5 air pollution in the USA: An analysis of a national prospective cohort;Pope;Air Qual. Atmos. Health,2018
5. Socioeconomic factors of PM2.5 concentrations in 152 Chinese cities: Decomposition analysis using LMDI;Zhang;J. Clean. Prod.,2019