Comparative Assessment of Insect Processing Technologies for Sustainable Insect Protein Production

Author:

Cámara-Ruiz María1,Sánchez-Venegas Alberto1,Blasco-Lavilla Nuria1,Hernández M. Dolores2,Sánchez-Liarte Francisca1,Fernández-Gutiérrez David1ORCID,Lara-Guillén Andrés J.1

Affiliation:

1. Technology Centre for Energy and the Environment (CETENMA), P.I. Cabezo Beaza, C/Sofía 6-13, 30353 Cartagena, Spain

2. Instituto Murciano de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario y Medioambiental (IMIDA), Estación de Acuicultura Marina, San Pedro del Pinatar, 30740 Murcia, Spain

Abstract

Considering the projected increase in demand for protein sources, finding alternative sources with lower environmental impacts has become of great importance. Insect mass production has emerged as a potential solution, particularly in Western countries. Previous studies indicate that insect farming together with insect processing stages are responsible for most of the environmental impacts associated with the final product. This study compares the environmental impacts linked to alternative processing technologies for insect protein production to traditional ones using a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) following the Environmental Footprint methodology. The most relevant impact categories were identified as land use, energy use, freshwater ecotoxicity, water use and climate change. Among the processing treatments, FOP (freezing–oven drying–hot pressing) showed the best environmental performance in terms of all selected impact categories except water use, while the BOS (blanching–oven drying–SFE with CO2) group had the highest environmental impacts in all categories. The results from this study indicate that the environmental impacts of insect protein production can be reduced by using alternative processing technologies. These findings underscore the importance of carefully selecting processing technologies in order to align with global sustainability ambitions in the food industry. This study contributes to the development of ecologically responsible methods that can be adopted across protein production industries.

Funder

Spanish National Plans of Aquaculture of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food

European Maritime and Fisheries Fund

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction

Reference39 articles.

1. Dossey, A.T., Morales-Ramos, J.A., and Rojas, M.G. (2016). Insects as Sustainable Food Ingredients: Production, Processing and Food Applications, Academic Press.

2. van Huis, A. (2013). Edible Insects: Future Prospects for Food and Feed Security, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO forestry paper.

3. Shockley, M., and Dossey, A.T. (2014). Mass Production of Beneficial Organisms, Elsevier.

4. Cadinu, L.A., Barra, P., Torre, F., Delogu, F., and Madau, F.A. (2020). Insect Rearing: Potential, Challenges, and Circularity. Sustainability, 12.

5. Assessment of Vegetable and Fruit Substrates as Potential Rearing Media for Hermetia Illucens (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) Larvae;Jucker;Environ. Entomo.,2017

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3