Affiliation:
1. Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Qassim University, Buraidah 51452, Saudi Arabia
2. Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21526, Egypt
3. Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport, Alexandria P.O. Box 1029, Egypt
Abstract
This study used the sweeping air approach to conduct a comparative analysis of pervaporation (PV) and membrane distillation (MD) in the context of desalinating saline/hypersaline water. An experimental setup of the sweeping air arrangement was designed and built at a laboratory size to conduct the research. The desalination process using PV used innovatively designed cellulose acetate (CA) membranes specifically adapted for this purpose. Conversely, in the studies involving MD, hydrophobic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes were utilised. CA membranes were fabricated in our laboratory using the phase inversion approach. The physicochemical characteristics of the membranes were assessed using many methodologies, including FTIR spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), contact angle measurement, and water uptake analysis. This facilitated a more comprehensive comprehension of the impact of the alkaline treatment on these features. The variables that were examined included the kind of membrane, the pore size of the PTFE membrane, the composition of the casting solution of CA, the concentration of the feed solution, the temperature of the feed, and the temperature of the condenser cooling water. The morphologies of the membranes were examined using SEM. The study’s findings indicated that the use of MD resulted in a greater flow and a remarkable percentage of salt rejection (% SR). Furthermore, it was observed that the flux was positively correlated with the feed temperature, while it exhibited an inverse relationship with the cooling water temperature. Moreover, it was observed that the impact of the pore size of the PTFE membrane on the desalination process was found to be minimal. The most optimal outcomes obtained were 13.35 kg/m2 h with a percentage salt rejection (% SR) of 99.86, and 17.96 kg/m2 h with a % SR of 99.83 at a temperature of 70 °C, while using MD and PV technologies, respectively. Furthermore, both methods demonstrated the capability to desalinate very salty solutions with a salinity level of up to 160 g/L, thereby yielding potable water in a single step.
Subject
Polymers and Plastics,General Chemistry
Reference107 articles.
1. Voutchkov, N. (2019). The Role of Desalination in an Increasingly Water-Scarce World, World Bank.
2. Energy Recovery in SWRO Desalination: Current Status and New Possibilities;Schunke;Front. Sustain. Cities,2020
3. Galiano, F., Castro-Muñoz, R., and Figoli, A. (2021). Pervaporation, Vapour Permeation and Membrane Distillation: From Membrane Fabrication to Application. Membranes, 11.
4. El Batouti, M., Alharby, N.F., and Elewa, M.M. (2021). Review of New Approaches for Fouling Mitigation in Membrane Separation Processes in Water Treatment Applications. Separations, 9.
5. Desalination by Membrane Pervaporation: A Review;Li;Desalination,2023
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献