Abstract
This paper is intended to perform a comparative and qualitative review among eight tools to measure energy sustainability. Therefore, it was necessary to create a theoretical and conceptual framework based on four criterias of selection and six categories of comparison. In this work, the conceptual bases that supported the research and the methodology created to carry out the comparative review will be presented. This analysis was based on the intrinsic concepts of energy sustainability of each of the reviewed tools with a critical qualitative analysis. Some conclusions shown through the conceptual framework developed that it was possible to apply an innovative methodology to qualitatively compare different tools to measure sustainability. The importance of this reflects the difficulty of conceptualizing the subjectivity of sustainable development, as shown throughout the paper, where it is often not possible to obtain a measurable result since the measured phenomenon is too complex to reduce it to a numerical value.
Subject
Energy (miscellaneous),Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Control and Optimization,Engineering (miscellaneous)
Reference148 articles.
1. Sustainable principles: common values for achieving sustainability
2. A conceptual review of the terms sustainable development and sustainability;Barbosa;Int. J. Soc. Sci.,2014
3. Strategic management as a tool for corporate governance: A case study;Eissmann;ESPAC,2017
4. Study on the financial viability in technological updating of a manufacturing plant: Use of highly efficient electric motors and LED lighting;Agostinho;ESPAC,2017
5. A Review of Utopian Themes in Sustainable Development Discourse
Cited by
36 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献