Abstract
(1) Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the hardness of resin cements polymerized through ceramic disks under different process factors (ceramic type and thickness, light-polymerization units and polymerization time); (2) Method: Three types of ceramic blocks were used (IPS e.max CAD; Celtra Duo; VITABLOCS). Ceramic disks measuring 0.5 mm, 1.0 mm and 1.5 mm were cut from commercial blocks. Two resin cements (Rely X Veneer and Variolink Esthetic) were polymerized through the ceramic specimens using distinct light-polymerization units (Deep-cure; Blue-phase) and time intervals (10 and 20 s). Hardness of cement specimens was measured using microhardness tester with a Knoop indenter. Data were statistically analyzed using factorial ANOVA (α = 5%); (3) Results: Mean microhardness of Rely X Veneer cement was significantly higher than that of Variolink Esthetic. Deep-cure resulted in higher mean microhardness values compared to Blue-phase at 0.5- and 1-mm specimen thicknesses. Moreover, a direct correlation was found between polymerization time and hardness of resin cement; (4) Conclusions: Surface hardness was affected by resin cement type and ceramic thickness, and not affected by ceramic types, within evaluated conditions. Increasing light-polymerization time significantly increased the hardness of the cement.
Funder
Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University
Reference34 articles.
1. Clinical Performance of Porcelain Laminate Veneers for up to 20 Years;Beier;Int. J. Prosthodont.,2012
2. Clinical Performance of Porcelain Laminate Veneers: Outcomes of the Aesthetic Pre-Evaluative Temporary (APT) Technique;Gurel;Int. J. Periodont. Restor. Dent.,2012
3. Ceramic dental biomaterials and CAD/CAM technology: State of the art
4. Cementing all-ceramic restorations
5. An p to 16-Year Prospective Study of 304 Porcelain Veneers;Layton;Int. J. Prosthodont.,2007
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献