Abstract
In Spring 2020, due to the rapid spread of COVID-19, all educational institutions in Latvia, including the University of Latvia (UL), transitioned from face-to-face on-site learning to remote learning. After a short period of face-to-face on-site learning in autumn, UL returned to remote learning in November for the second time. This paper investigates the UL students’ perspectives on remote teaching and learning at the UL during the first and second COVID-19 periods. The research assesses several remote study organization aspects, including the lecturer’s and student’s digital skills, their access to information and support during the study process, planning and implementation of the study process, and students’ acquisition of the content. The study used an original questionnaire designed in the Spring 2020 semester. Seven questions from the first questionnaire were included in another follow-up questionnaire distributed in the Spring 2021 semester. A total of 2248 UL students from the Spring 2020 semester and 742 students from the Spring 2021 semester participated in the study, representing 13 faculties across all study levels. The survey responses were collected via a QuestionPro survey platform and then downloaded into an IBM SPSS 28 file for a reliability check. Next, descriptive statistical analyses were conducted for each reported survey item using Microsoft Excel 2016. The research presented here implies that, in general, students perceive positive improvements in almost all the investigated aspects of the organization of the remote study process when comparing the first and second COVID-19 periods, which could indicate a certain level of resilience in students and university lecturers when subject to COVID circumstances. However, the results reveal that students have, in one year, developed a more realistic approach in assessing their digital skills. The results lead us to believe that remote on-line learning is not just a short-term solution but could become a valuable element for providing qualitative education in the long term. It could indicate that the students and lecturers at university are ready for new and sustainable higher education study organization solutions in the future.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference28 articles.
1. The Impact of COVID-19 on Higher Education: A Review of Emerging Evidence (NESET Report);Farnell,2021
2. Approaches in Learning and Teaching to Promoting Equity and Inclusionhttps://eua.eu/downloads/publications/eua%20tpg%20report_approaches%20in%20learning%20and%20teaching%20to%20promoting%20equity%20and%20inclusion.pdf
3. Saeima (The Parliament of the Republic of Latvia). Izglītības likums [Law of Education]https://likumi.lv/ta/id/50759-izglitibas-likums
4. Nachhaltiges Lernen—Einblicke in eine Längsschnittuntersuchung unter der Kategorie “Emotionalität in Lernprozessen“. [Sustainable learning—insights into a longitudinal study under the category “Emotionality in learning processes”];Schüßler;Rep. Lit. Forsch. Weit.,2004
5. COVID-19 impact on higher education–the trigger for digital transformation: A case study;Vindača,2020
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献