Subsidies for Forest Environment and Climate: A Viable Solution for Forest Conservation in Romania?

Abstract

The conservation of biodiversity and forest ecosystems from the perspective of increasingly pronounced climate changes represents a priority objective for present and future society. In recent decades, alongside traditional conservation methods, innovative tools such as PES (Payment for Ecosystem Services) have been introduced to support biodiversity conservation. The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of financial mechanisms for forest ecosystem conservation from the perspective of voluntary adoption by forest owners of additional conservation measures beyond those required by national environmental legislation. Through the conceptual literature review, 6069 articles were analyzed, which described the general context of the application of PES, the aims and objectives related to climate and environmental issues, the beneficiaries, as well as the legislative conditions, and the research direction in the last 7 years. The study aims to provide relevant information regarding the viability and potential impact of PES on achieving the goal of forest ecosystem conservation in Romania, during the period 2017–2023. We identified 904 cases involving 887 entities that have committed to the program for the voluntary adoption of additional measures. It has been stated that a PES approach can lead to increased efficiency in conservation actions. Following the temporal analysis of the number of applications, it was observed that in the first sessions there was a low number of applications, which means very high reluctance of the potential beneficiaries of PES, but once the first program was implemented, their interest increased. The study found a strong correlation between payments and the areas and number of plots under commitment, while there was a less strong correlation with the geographical region. Based on the data obtained, the potential impact of PES in Romania was evaluated at the social level, quantified in the number of applications submitted, and at the economic level, with the amount of money paid to applicants. The environmental impact was measured by analyzing the areas included in the subsidy mechanism and identifying the minimum 20% of the eligible areas, totally exempt from forestry interventions, which produce effects on forests, soil, water and environment.