A Literature Review on Existing Methods and Indicators for Evaluating the Efficiency of Power-to-X Processes

Author:

Eggers Natascha123ORCID,Birth Torsten23ORCID,Sankol Bernd2,Kerpen Lukas3,Hurtado Antonio1

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Power Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany

2. Department of Information and Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Applied Life Sciences Hamburg, 20099 Hamburg, Germany

3. Energy- and Resource-Efficient Systems, Energy Systems and Infrastructures, Fraunhofer Institute for Factory Operation and Automation IFF, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany

Abstract

The challenges posed by climate change have prompted significant growth in efficiency evaluation and optimization research, especially in recent years. This has spawned a variety of heterogeneous methods and approaches to the assessment of technical processes. These methods and approaches are rarely comparable and are usually only applicable to specific sectors. This paper provides an overview of the literature on efficiency assessment methods and KPIs, leading to a more manageable selection of an appropriate method with special regard to energy system integration technologies. In addition to reviewing the literature systematically, this paper examines existing methods and indicators’ applicability to and significance for efficiency optimization. In this context, a holistic approach to process design, evaluation, and improvement is given with particular regard to power-to-X systems. Within the framework of the study, three overarching goals could be defined as levels of efficiency evaluation of power-to-X systems: 1. identification of the process (steps) with the most significant optimization potential, 2. identification of the process phases with the greatest optimization potential (timewise considered), and 3. derivation of specific recommendations for action for the improvement of a process. For each of these levels, the most suitable evaluation methods were identified. While various methods, such as life cycle assessment and physical optimum, are particularly suitable for Level 1 and Level 2, for Level 3, even the best-identified methods have to be extended on a case-by-case basis. To address this challenge, a new approach to a holistic evaluation of power-to-X systems was developed based on the study’s findings.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference91 articles.

1. Sustainability and Life Cycle Assessment in Industrial Biotechnology: A Review of Current Approaches and Future Needs;Hiete;Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol.,2020

2. A Taxonomy for Key Performance Indicators Management;Rubio;J. Comput. Stand. Interfaces,2018

3. Schaltegger, S., Zvezdov, D., Etxeberria, I.A., Csutora, M., and Günther, E. (2015). Corporate Carbon and Climate Accounting, Springer International Publishing.

4. An analytical review of irrigation efficiency measured using deterministic and stochastic models;Pereira;Agric. Water Manag.,2017

5. Critical Review of Competitiveness Indicators for Energy Projects;Colla;Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.,2020

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3