Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
2. National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China
Abstract
S-parameters are widely used to detail the scattering parameters of radio frequency (RF) components and microwave circuit modules. The vector network analyzer (VNA) is the most commonly used device for measuring S-parameters. Given the multiple frequency points, complex values, and intricate uncertainty propagation involved, accurately assessing the uncertainty of S-parameter measurements is difficult. In this study, we proposed a new method for assessing S-parameter uncertainty based on the covariance matrices, tracing back to the nominal uncertainty of calibration standards. First, we analyzed the relevant theory of uncertainty assessment using covariance matrices and subsequently deduced the mechanism of Type B uncertainty propagating from calibration standards to error model coefficients and S-parameter measurements to evaluate Type B measurement uncertainty. In this study, a novel measurement system was constructed for measuring grounded coplanar waveguides by using a VNA and calibration standards with 8- and 12-error models. Initially, the model assessed the Type B uncertainty of measuring four S-parameters of a grounded coplanar waveguide. Next, the VNA calibrated with the 12-error model was used to conduct multiple repeated measurements to assess the Type A uncertainty of the grounded coplanar waveguide. Finally, the composite uncertainty was constructed, which demonstrated that the proposed method can be used for assessing the uncertainty of S-parameters.
Reference22 articles.
1. Determining the covariance matrix for a nonlinear implicit multivariate measurement equation uncertainty analysis;Ramnath;Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng.,2022
2. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, and OIML (2011). Evaluation of measurement data—Supplement 1 to the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement—Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method. JCGM, 101, 2008.
3. Expanded uncertainty regions for complex quantities in polar coordinates;Hall;Metrologia,2015
4. Evaluating the measurement uncertainty of complex quantities: A selective review;Hall;Metrologia,2016
5. Hall, B.D. (2004, January 2–3). Calculations of measurement uncertainty in complex-valued quantities involving ‘uncertainty in the uncertainty’. Proceedings of the 64th ARFTG Microwave Measurements Conference, Fall 2004, Orlando, FL, USA.