Benchmarking Geospatial High-Value Data Openness Using GODI Plus Methodology: A Regional Level Case Study

Author:

Kević Karlo1ORCID,Kuveždić Divjak Ana1ORCID,Welle Donker Frederika2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Geodesy Zagreb, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

2. Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands

Abstract

The 2019 European Open Data Directive identifies geospatial data as data that could have a major impact on human activities (high-value data, HVD) and advocates its provision as open data (OD), i.e., without barriers to access and re-use. Although Croatia has implemented OD policies to support the provision of open data, many geospatial data are still not available, or if available, their level of openness ranks Croatia lower than Slovenia and Serbia on some ranking lists. Benchmarking tools have proven to be a powerful tool in identifying barriers in OD. This paper, therefore, benchmarks the level of openness and provision of geospatial HVD in Croatia, Slovenia and Serbia, using the extended and modified Global Open Data Index methodology (GODI Plus). It is expected that this will provide an answer to the status of OD policies and government engagement in OD in Croatia and identify good OD practices among the three countries analyzed. Furthermore, the results will be a baseline benchmark for future HVD analyses. The results reveal low data openness for Croatia and Serbia, high data openness for Slovenia, and a low level of government engagement in all three proposed countries.

Funder

European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Computers in Earth Sciences,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference49 articles.

1. European Commission (2011). Digital Agenda: Commission’s Open Data Strategy, Questions & Answers, European Commission.

2. A systematic review of open government data initiatives;Attard;Gov. Inform. Q.,2015

3. Ibrahim, A., Abdullah, S.D., and Arief, A. (2020, January 16–17). Benefits and Barriers of Open and One Government Data: A Systematic Review. Proceedings of the Workshop on Environmental Science, Society, and Technology (WESTECH 2020), Makassar, Indonesia.

4. Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government;Janssen;Inform. Syst. Manag.,2012

5. Benefits and Risks of Open Government Data;Kucera;J. Syst. Integr.,2014

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3