Digital Cytology in Veterinary Education: A Comprehensive Survey of Its Application and Perception among Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students
Author:
Giacomazzo Marta1ORCID, Cian Francesco2, Castagnaro Massimo1, Gelain Maria Elena1ORCID, Bonsembiante Federico3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy 2. BattLab, Coventry CV4 7EZ, UK 3. Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated technological changes in veterinary education, particularly in clinical pathology and anatomic pathology courses transitioning from traditional methods to digital pathology (DP). This study evaluates the personal effectiveness and satisfaction, as well as the advantages and disadvantages, of DP, in particular digital cytology (DC), as a teaching method among European veterinary students, both at the undergraduate and postgraduate level, who attended digital pathology courses during and before the pandemic. A further aim is to discuss the differences between the two student groups. A Google Form survey consisting of 11 multiple-choice questions was emailed to pathology teachers and distributed to their students. Results indicated that undergraduate students showed greater digital pathology training, favouring DC as the most effective learning modality. In contrast, postgraduate students reported less digital slide training, and their preference for learning cytology was split between DC alone and DC integrated with traditional microscopy. All students experienced whole slide imaging for learning cytology slides prevalently, and they stated that DC enhanced their learning experience. While DC demonstrates personal effectiveness and satisfaction as a teaching method, it is important to not replace pathology training with light microscopy completely, as almost a third of the students indicated.
Reference33 articles.
1. Avignon, D., Farnir, F., Iatridou, D., Iwersen, M., Lekeux, P., Moser, V., Saunders, J., Schwarz, T., Sternberg-Lewerin, S., and Weller, R. (2023, February 18). Report of the Eccvt Expert Working Group on the Impact of Digital Technologies & Artificial Intelligence in Veterinary Education and Practice Final Report. Available online: https://www.eaeve.org-www.ebvs.org-www.fve.org. 2. Routh, J., Paramasivam, S.J., Cockcroft, P., Nadarajah, V.D., and Jeevaratnam, K. (2021). Veterinary Education during COVID-19 and Beyond—Challenges and Mitigating Approaches. Animals, 11. 3. Microscope use in clinical veterinary practice and potential implications for veterinary school curricula;Stewart;J. Vet. Med. Educ.,2014 4. Balseiro, A., Pérez-Martínez, C., de Paz, P., and Iglesias, M.J.G. (2022). Evaluation of the COVID-19 Lockdown-Adapted Online Methodology for the Cytology and Histology Course as Part of the Degree in Veterinary Medicine. Vet. Sci., 9. 5. Whole-Slide Imaging and Automated Image Analysis;Webster;Vet. Pathol.,2013
|
|