A Bibliometric Analysis of the FinTech Agility Literature: Evolution and Review

Author:

Sahid Abdelkebir1ORCID,Maleh Yassine2ORCID,Asemanjerdi Shahram Atashi3ORCID,Martín-Cervantes Pedro Antonio4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. SIAD Laboratory, ENCG Settat, Hassan 1st University, Settat 26000, Morocco

2. LaSTI Laboratory, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, Beni Mellal 25000, Morocco

3. Department of Applied Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business Sciences, University of Valladolid, 47002 Valladolid, Spain

4. Department of Financial Economics and Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business Sciences, University of Valladolid, 47002 Valladolid, Spain

Abstract

Bibliometric analysis is crucial in understanding the evolution of research trends and knowledge in various fields. This study applies bibliometric analysis to explore the growth of the research paradigm on agility in the FinTech literature, using co-citation analysis and bibliographic coupling of selected articles. Based on this bibliometric analysis, the evolution of research on agility in the FinTech domain has been prepared, focusing on the literature related to FinTech agility between 1984 and 2022. In this study, we also address the limitations of individual analyses from Scopus and Web of Science (WOS) and propose a comprehensive approach by merging the two research databases. The results reveal significant disparities between authors, publication influences, and keyword occurrences between the WOS and merged databases. Our research highlights the importance of combining a database approach in bibliometric studies, providing valuable insights for scholars, researchers, and stakeholders. Finally, the in-depth bibliometric analysis demonstrates the significance of “FinTech agility” in the rapidly evolving FinTech sector. Financial technology companies’ agility, or ability to adapt quickly, is the foundation of their success and innovation.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Finance

Reference52 articles.

1. Government agility and management information systems: Study of regional government financial reports;Ahmad;The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business,2020

2. Fintech and regtech: Impact on regulators and banks;Anagnostopoulos;Journal of Economics and Business,2018

3. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys;Armstrong;Journal of Marketing Research,1977

4. Social irresponsibility in management;Armstrong;Journal of Business Research,1977

5. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation;Bharadwaj;MIS Quarterly,2000

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3