Risk Factors for Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Appendectomy

Author:

Bancke Laverde Bruno Leonardo1ORCID,Maak Matthias1,Langheinrich Melanie2ORCID,Kersting Stephan2ORCID,Denz Axel1,Krautz Christian1ORCID,Weber Georg F.1ORCID,Grützmann Robert1,Brunner Maximilian1

Affiliation:

1. Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054 Erlangen, Germany

2. Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Straße, 17475 Greifswald, Germany

Abstract

(1) Background: Since its introduction in the 1990s, laparoscopic appendectomy has become established over the years and is today considered the standard therapy for acute appendicitis. In some cases, however, a conversion to the open approach is still necessary. The primary aim of this study was to identify risk factors for the need to convert from the laparoscopic to an open approach during appendectomy for acute appendicitis. (2) Methods: A retrospective analysis of 1220 adult patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis from 2010 to 2020 at the University Hospital Erlangen was performed. Data, including patient demographics and pre-, intra-, and postoperative findings, were collected and compared between patients with and without conversion. (3) Results: The conversion rate in our cohort was 5.5%. A higher preoperative WBC count and CRP (OR 1.9, p = 0.042, and OR 2.3, p = 0.019, respectively), as well as the presence of intraoperative perforation, necrosis or gangrene, perityphlitic abscess and peritonitis (OR 3.2, p = 0.001; OR 2.3, p = 0.023; OR 2.6, p = 0.006 and OR 2.0, p = 0.025, respectively) were identified as independent risk factors for conversion from the laparoscopic to the open approach. Conversion was again independently associated with higher morbidity (OR 2.2, p = 0.043). (4) Conclusion: The laparoscopic approach is feasible and safe in the majority of patients with acute appendicitis. Only increased inflammatory blood markers could be detected as the preoperative risk factors potentially influencing the choice of surgical approach but only with low specificity and sensitivity. For the decision to convert, intraoperative findings are additionally crucial. However, patients with conversion should receive special attention in the postoperative course, as these have an increased risk of developing complications.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. The Global Incidence of Appendicitis: A Systematic Review of Population-based Studies;Ferris;Ann. Surg.,2017

2. Acute Appendicitis: Trends in Surgical Treatment—A Population-Based Study of Over 800,000 Patients;Nitsche;Dtsch. Arztebl. Int.,2021

3. Endoscopic appendectomy;Semm;Endoscopy,1983

4. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines;Podda;World J. Emerg. Surg.,2020

5. Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy;Shaikh;JSLS,2009

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3