A Comparative Analysis of DNN and Conventional Signal Detection Techniques in SISO and MIMO Communication Systems
Author:
Shoukat Hamna1, Khurshid Abdul Ahad1, Daha Muhammad Yunis2, Shahid Kamal1, Hadi Muhammad Usman2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Institute of Electrical, Electronics, and Computer Engineering, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54590, Pakistan 2. School of Engineering, Ulster University, Belfast BT15 1AP, UK
Abstract
This paper investigates the performance of deep neural network (DNN)-based signal detection in multiple input, multiple output (MIMO), communication systems. MIMO technology plays a critical role in achieving high data rates and improved capacity in modern wireless communication standards like 5G. However, signal detection in MIMO systems presents significant challenges due to channel complexities. This study conducts a comparative analysis of signal detection techniques within both the single input, single output (SISO), and MIMO frameworks. The analysis focuses on the entire transmission chain, encompassing transmitters, channels, and receivers. The effectiveness of three traditional methods—maximum likelihood detection (MLD), minimum mean square error (MMSE), and zero-forcing (ZF)—is meticulously evaluated alongside a novel DNN-based approach. The proposed study presents a novel DNN-based signal detection model. While this model demonstrates superior computational efficiency and symbol error rate (SER) performance compared to more conventional techniques like MLD, MMSE, and ZF in the context of a SISO system, MIMO systems face some challenges in outperforming the conventional techniques specifically in terms of computation times. This complexity of MIMO systems presents challenges that the current DNN design has yet to fully address, indicating the need for further developments in wireless communication technology. The observed performance difference between SISO and MIMO systems underscores the need for further research on the adaptability and limitations of DNN architectures in MIMO contexts. These findings pave the way for future explorations of advanced neural network architectures and algorithms specifically designed for MIMO signal-processing tasks. By overcoming the performance gap observed in this work, such advancements hold significant promise for enhancing the effectiveness of DNN-based signal detection in MIMO communication systems.
Reference22 articles.
1. Huang, Y., Sun, S., Duan, X., and Chen, Z. (2016, January 3–5). A study on Deep Neural Networks framework. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IMCEC), Xi’an, China. 2. Dixit, G.K., Ch, V., Barbosa, V.J., Jeelani, S.H., Johari, L., and Shukla, S.K. (2022, January 28–29). Comparative Analysis of Neural Networks and Deep Learning using Wireless Communication. Proceedings of the 2022 2nd International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE), Greater Noida, India. 3. Angra, S., and Ahuja, S. (2017, January 23–25). Machine learning and its applications: A review. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Big Data Analytics and Computational Intelligence (ICBDAC), Chirala, Andhra Pradesh, India. 4. Jha, K.K., Jha, R., Jha, A.K., Hassan, M.A.M., Yadav, S.K., and Mahesh, T. (2021, January 16–18). A Brief Comparison on Machine Learning Algorithms Based on Various Applications: A Comprehensive Survey. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Computation System and Information Technology for Sustainable Solutions (CSITSS), Bangalore, India. 5. Fujii, S., and Hayashi, H. (2019, January 11–13). Comparison of Performance by Activation Functions on Deep Image Prior. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Information and Communication (ICAIIC), Okinawa, Japan.
|
|