Optimising the Performance of CO2-Cured Alkali-Activated Aluminosilicate Industrial By-Products as Precursors

Author:

Lamaa Ghandy1ORCID,Suescum-Morales David2ORCID,Duarte António P. C.1,Silva Rui Vasco1ORCID,de Brito Jorge1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. CERIS, Civil Engineering, Architecture and Georresources Department, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal

2. Área de Ingeniería de la Construcción, Edificio Leonardo da Vinci, Universidad de Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, E-14071 Córdoba, Spain

Abstract

Three industrial aluminosilicate wastes were studied as precursors to produce alkali-activated concrete: (i) electric arc furnace slag, (ii) municipal solid waste incineration bottom ashes, and (iii) waste glass rejects. These were characterized via X-ray diffraction and fluorescence, laser particle size distribution, thermogravimetric, and Fourier-transform infrared analyses. Distinctive combinations of anhydrous sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate solution were tried by varying the Na2O/binder ratio (8%, 10%, 12%, 14%) and SiO2/Na2O ratio (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5) to find the optimum solution for maximized mechanical performance. Specimens were produced and subjected to a three-step curing process: (1) 24 h thermal curing (70 °C), (2) followed by 21 days of dry curing in a climatic chamber (~21 °C, 65% RH), and (3) ending with a 7-day carbonation curing stage (5 ± 0.2% CO2; 65 ± 10% RH). Compressive and flexural strength tests were performed, to ascertain the mix with the best mechanical performance. The precursors showed reasonable bonding capabilities, thus suggesting some reactivity when alkali-activated due to the presence of amorphous phases. Mixes with slag and glass showed compressive strengths of almost 40 MPa. Most mixes required a higher Na2O/binder ratio for maximized performance, even though, contrary to expectations, the opposite was observed for the SiO2/Na2O ratio.

Funder

FCT—Foundation for Science and Technology

FCT

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Materials Science

Reference99 articles.

1. Mindess, S., Young, J.F., and Darwin, D. (2003). Concrete, Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Inc.. [2nd ed.].

2. Nobis, R. (2021). Illustrated History of Cement and Concrete: The Exciting Development of Two Outstanding Building Materials, Rainer Nobis.

3. U.S. Geological Survey (2019). Cement Production Worldwide from 1995 to 2020, USGS—Mineral Commodity Summaries 2021.

4. IEA (2022, November 15). Cement Roadmap. Available online: http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/Cement_Roadmap_Foldout_WEB.pdf.

5. Conners, C. (2022, November 16). Empire State Building Fact Sheet. Available online: https://www.esbnyc.com.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3