Whole Goat Milk-Based Formula versus Whey-Based Cow Milk Formula: What Formula Do Infants Enjoy More?—A Feasibility, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

Jung Camille12ORCID,González Serrano Adolfo2,Batard Christophe3,Seror Elisa4,Gelwane Georges5,Poidvin Amélie6,Lavallée Isabelle4,Elbez Annie7,Brussieux Maxime1ORCID,Prosser Colin8,Gallier Sophie8ORCID,Bellaïche Marc9

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Research Center, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, 94000 Créteil, France

2. Inserm, IMRB, Université Paris-Est-Créteil, 94000 Créteil, France

3. Private Pediatric Practice, 94080 Vincennes, France

4. Private Pediatric Practice, 75000 Paris, France

5. Private Pediatric Practice, 92012 Boulogne-Billancourt, France

6. Private Pediatric Practice, 92035 La Garenne-Colombes, France

7. Private Pediatric Practice, 94700 Maisons-Alfort, France

8. Dairy Goat Co-Operative (N.Z.) Ltd., Hamilton 3204, New Zealand

9. Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Robert Debré Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75019 Paris, France

Abstract

(1) Background: While goat milk formula (GMF) is an alternative to cow milk formula (CMF), infants’ preferences for one over the other have not been formally assessed. Specifically, our aim in this study was to determine whether infants experience fewer feeding behavior problems with whole milk-based GMF than with conventional whey-based CMF. (2) Methods: This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial with two-arm parallel assignment conducted in six pediatricians’ offices in or near Paris, France, between June 2018 and 31 December 2021. Overall, 64 healthy infants (≤4 months old), predominantly formula-fed, were randomly assigned to either the whole milk-based GMF (n = 33) or whey-based CMF (n = 31) arm. Parents completed the Baby Eating Behavior Questionnaire (BEBQ) and the modified QUALIN questionnaire to evaluate infant feeding behavior and quality of life (psychomotor and socioemotional development), respectively, at inclusion (1 to 5 days before milk delivery) and the final visit (day 28 ± 3 after milk delivery). Informed consent was obtained for all recruited patients, and an ethical committee approved the study. (3) Results: Changes in BEBQ Enjoyment of Food and Slowness in Eating subscale scores from inclusion to final visit did not differ between arms. However, there were significant improvements in subscale scores for Food Responsiveness (GMF: 0.15 ± 1; CMF: −0.48 ± 0.81; p = 0.010) and General Appetite (GMF: 0.26 ± 1.2; CMF: −0.48 ± 0.88; p = 0.012), and modified QUALIN (GMF: 4.6 ± 9.4; CMF: −0.40 ± 7.6; p = 0.03) scores in favor of the GMF group. (4) Conclusions: In this double-blind, randomized controlled trial, GMF-fed infants exhibited a greater general appetite than CMF-fed infants, possibly due to differences in the composition of these formulas (i.e., protein and lipid profiles). In addition, GMF-fed infants enjoyed a better quality of life. There was no difference in food enjoyment between groups. These findings suggest that whole-milk-based GMF could be an attractive alternative to whey-based CMF. Clinical trial registration: NCT03488758 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Funder

Dairy Goat Co-operative (N.Z.) Ltd.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Food Science,Nutrition and Dietetics

Reference35 articles.

1. The New Rome IV Criteria for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders in Infants and Toddlers;Zeevenhooven;Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Nutr.,2017

2. Gastrointestinal symptoms in infancy: A population-based prospective study;Iacono;Dig. Liver Dis.,2005

3. Psychosocial mechanisms for the transmission of somatic symptoms from parents to children;Levy;World J. Gastroenterol.,2015

4. Living and coping with excessive infantile crying;Long;J. Adv. Nurs.,2001

5. World Health Organization, and United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) (2023, September 16). Implementation Guidance: Protecting, Promoting and Supporting Breastfeeding in Facilities Providing Maternity and Newborn Services: The Revised Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative, Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/272943.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3