No Significant Differences between Bisphosphonates and Placebo for the Treatment of Bone Marrow Lesions of the Knee: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to summarize the current evidence on the role of bisphosphonates in the treatment of knee bone marrow lesions (BMLs), to understand whether they are truly effective in improving symptoms and restoring the subchondral bone status at imaging evaluation. Methods: A literature search was carried out on PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Potential risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies. Results: A total of 15 studies were included in the present systematic review and meta-analysis. Seven studies were RCTs, two were prospective cohort studies, three were retrospective, and three were case series. Our meta-analysis revealed that bisphosphonates did not significantly improve clinical scores or reduce BML size compared to placebo. Accordingly, the rate of adverse events was also non-significantly higher among bisphosphonate users versus placebo users. Conclusions: The main finding of the present meta-analysis and systematic review is that bisphosphonates show neither significant benefits nor significant adverse events when compared to placebo in the treatment of BMLs of the knee. Level of Evidence: Level IV systematic review of level II–III–IV studies. Level I meta-analysis of level I studies.