Machine Learning Prediction of Treatment Response to Biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Author:

Salehi Fatemeh1,Lopera Gonzalez Luis I.2ORCID,Bayat Sara34,Kleyer Arnd5,Zanca Dario1ORCID,Brost Alexander6,Schett Georg34,Eskofier Bjoern M.17ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Machine Learning and Data Analytics Laboratory, Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91052 Erlangen, Germany

2. Instutue of Digital Health, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91052 Erlangen, Germany

3. Department of Internal Medicine 3, Rheumatology and Immunology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany

4. Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), 91054 Erlangen, Germany

5. Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité—University Medicine Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany

6. Siemens Healthcare GmbH, 91301 Forchheim, Germany

7. Translational Digital Health Group, Institute of AI for Health, Helmholtz Center Munich—German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany

Abstract

Background: Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) have shown efficacy in treating Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Predicting treatment outcomes for RA is crucial as approximately 30% of patients do not respond to bDMARDs and only half achieve a sustained response. This study aims to leverage machine learning to predict both initial response at 6 months and sustained response at 12 months using baseline clinical data. Methods: Baseline clinical data were collected from 154 RA patients treated at the University Hospital in Erlangen, Germany. Five machine learning models were compared: Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Random Forest. Nested cross-validation was employed to ensure robustness and avoid overfitting, integrating hyperparameter tuning within its process. Results: XGBoost achieved the highest accuracy for predicting initial response (AUC-ROC of 0.91), while AdaBoost was the most effective for sustained response (AUC-ROC of 0.84). Key predictors included the Disease Activity Score-28 using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), with higher scores at baseline associated with lower response chances at 6 and 12 months. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) identified the most important baseline features and visualized their directional effects on treatment response and sustained response. Conclusions: These findings can enhance RA treatment plans and support clinical decision-making, ultimately improving patient outcomes by predicting response before starting medication.

Funder

Digital Health Innovation Platform

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3