Assessing Upper Limb Function in Breast Cancer Survivors Using Wearable Sensors and Machine Learning in a Free-Living Environment

Author:

Vets Nieke12,De Groef An1234,Verbeelen Kaat23,Devoogdt Nele125ORCID,Smeets Ann67,Van Assche Dieter1ORCID,De Baets Liesbet48ORCID,Emmerzaal Jill1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium

2. CarEdOn Research Group, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium

3. MOVANT Research Group, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Antwerp, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium

4. Pain in Motion International Research Group, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium

5. Center for Lymphoedema, Department of Vascular Surgery, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, UZ Leuven—University Hospitals Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium

6. KU Leuven, Department of Oncology, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium

7. Surgical Oncology, UZ Leuven—University Hospitals Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium

8. Pain in Motion (PAIN) Research Group, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium

Abstract

(1) Background: Being able to objectively assess upper limb (UL) dysfunction in breast cancer survivors (BCS) is an emerging issue. This study aims to determine the accuracy of a pre-trained lab-based machine learning model (MLM) to distinguish functional from non-functional arm movements in a home situation in BCS. (2) Methods: Participants performed four daily life activities while wearing two wrist accelerometers and being video recorded. To define UL functioning, video data were annotated and accelerometer data were analyzed using a counts threshold method and an MLM. Prediction accuracy, recall, sensitivity, f1-score, ‘total minutes functional activity’ and ‘percentage functionally active’ were considered. (3) Results: Despite a good MLM accuracy (0.77–0.90), recall, and specificity, the f1-score was poor. An overestimation of the ‘total minutes functional activity’ and ‘percentage functionally active’ was found by the MLM. Between the video-annotated data and the functional activity determined by the MLM, the mean differences were 0.14% and 0.10% for the left and right side, respectively. For the video-annotated data versus the counts threshold method, the mean differences were 0.27% and 0.24%, respectively. (4) Conclusions: An MLM is a better alternative than the counts threshold method for distinguishing functional from non-functional arm movements. However, the abovementioned wrist accelerometer-based assessment methods overestimate UL functional activity.

Funder

KU Leuven

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Biochemistry,Instrumentation,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics,Analytical Chemistry

Reference23 articles.

1. Development of the Quickdash: Comparison of Three Item-Reduction Approaches;Beaton;J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am.,2005

2. Shoulder assessment according to the international classification of functioning by means of inertial sensor technologies: A systematic review;Matheve;Gait Posture,2017

3. The Association between Upper Limb Function and Variables at the Different Domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in Women after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review;Dams;Disabil. Rehabil.,2020

4. Measuring shoulder function: A systematic review of four questionnaires;Roy;Arthritis Rheum.,2009

5. Musculoskeletal Model of the Upper Limb Based on the Visible Human Male Dataset;Garner;Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng.,2001

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3