Dosimetric Evaluation of 177Lu Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Using GATE and Planet Dose

Author:

Stamouli Ioanna1,Nanos Thomas1,Chatzipapas Konstantinos2ORCID,Papadimitroulas Panagiotis3ORCID,Zoglopitou Lydia-Aggeliki4,Kalathas Theodoros4,Katsakiori Paraskevi F.1,Makridou Anna5,Kagadis George C.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 3dmi Research Group, Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Rion, Greece

2. Laboratoire de Traitement de l’Information Médicale (LaTIM), UMR1101, INSERM, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, 29200 Brest, France

3. Bioemission Technology Solutions (BIOEMTECH), 11472 Athens, Greece

4. Nuclear Medicine Department, Cancer Hospital of Thessaloniki “Theagenio”, 54007 Thessaloniki, Greece

5. Medical Physics Department, Cancer Hospital Thessaloniki “Theagenio”, 54007 Thessaloniki, Greece

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the commercial dosimetric software Planet® Dose (version 3.1.1) from DOSIsoft and the open-source toolkit GATE. Dosimetry was performed for six patients receiving 200 mCi of Lutathera® every 8 weeks for four treatment cycles. For the dose calculation with Planet®, SPECT/CT images were acquired at 4, 24, 72 and 192 h post-injection. After the registration of all the time points to T0, the organs of interest (OOIs) were segmented. Time-activity curves were produced and the absorbed dose was calculated using the bi- and tri-exponential fitting methods. Regarding GATE simulations, the SPECT images of the 24 h time point were utilized for the radiopharmaceutical biodistribution in the OOIs and the attenuation maps were produced using the CT images. For liver and spleen, the average relative difference between GATE and Planet® was 9.6% and 11.1% for biexponential and 12.4% and 30.5% for triexponential fitting, respectively. The right and left kidneys showed differences up to 10.7% and 10.4% for the biexponential and up to 60.6% and 11.9% for the triexponential model, respectively. The absorbed dose calculated with GATE, Planet®(bi-exp) and Planet®(tri-exp) was in agreement with the literature. The results of the bi-exponential fitting were similar to the GATE-resulted calculations, while the tri-exponential fitting had a higher relative difference.

Funder

Marie Skłodowska-Curie

ERA PerMed

H.F.R.I.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science

Reference43 articles.

1. Nothing But NET: A Review of Neuroendocrine Tumors and Carcinomas;Oronsky;Neoplasia,2017

2. PDQ Adult Treatment Editorial Board (2023, July 30). Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors Treatment (PDQ®): Health Professional Version, Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK65769/.

3. Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors;Cives;CA A Cancer J. Clin.,2018

4. Epidemiology, Incidence, and Prevalence of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Are There Global Differences?;Das;Curr. Oncol. Rep.,2021

5. Role of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET in the Study of Neuroendocrine Tumors;Panagiotidis;PET Clin.,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3