Effects of Social Facilitation and Introduction Methods for Cattle on Virtual Fence Adaptation

Author:

Simonsen Pernille Arent1ORCID,Husted Niels Søborg1ORCID,Clausen Magnus1ORCID,Spens Amalie-Maria1ORCID,Dyrholm Rasmus Majland1ORCID,Thaysen Ida Fabricius1ORCID,Aaser Magnus Fjord1ORCID,Staahltoft Søren Krabbe1ORCID,Bruhn Dan12ORCID,Alstrup Aage Kristian Olsen34ORCID,Sonne Christian5,Pertoldi Cino16ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7H, 9220 Aalborg Øst, Denmark

2. Skagen Bird Observatory, Fyrvej 36, 9990 Skagen, Denmark

3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark

4. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark

5. Department of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark

6. Aalborg Zoo, Mølleparkvej 63, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark

Abstract

Agricultural industries rely on physical fences to manage livestock. However, these present practical, financial, and ecological challenges, which may be solved using virtual fencing. This study aimed to identify how experienced cattle through social facilitation and the introduction method influence inexperienced cattle. Based on three stocks held in Fanø, Denmark, containing 12, 17 and 13 Angus (Bos taurus), we examined the virtual fence learning in three case studies using one gradual introduction with zero experienced cattle (A) and two different instant introductions with one (B) and ten (C) experienced cattle. Gradual introduction had the virtual fence moved 20 m every other day for eleven days, and in the two instant introductions, the physical fence was removed in one day. Warnings and impulses were recorded during an 11-day learning period and a 26-day post-learning period, using the impulses per warning to quantify if the cattle adapted. Case studies A and B showed a significant reduction in the warnings and impulses, but only A showed a significant reduction in the impulses per warning when comparing the learning period to the post-learning period. Due to the non-standardised experiments, it was not possible to conclude if the number of experienced cattle or the introduction method had an effect on the results.

Funder

15. Juni Fonden

Hedeselskabet

Markus Jebsens Naturpulje

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference28 articles.

1. Dairy cattle production in europe;Liinamo;Theriogenology,2003

2. A fence runs through it: A call for greater attention to the influence of fences on wildlife and ecosystems;Jakes;Biol. Conserv.,2018

3. To fence or not to fence;Woodroffe;Science,2014

4. Do fences create an edge-effect on the movement patterns of a highly mobile mega-herbivore?;Vanak;Biol. Conserv.,2010

5. Testing a new virtual fencing system on sheep;Brunberg;Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. A—Anim. Sci.,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3