Abstract
Irrigation contributes to land and ecosystem degradation, especially in intensive farming areas. However, in marginal areas, long-established irrigation systems also supply agroecosystem services. This study aimed to identify and prioritize the external benefits provided by irrigation in extensive grazing farms in an Italian alpine region (Aosta Valley, NW Italy). Three local stakeholder groups (land irrigation consortia members, non-farmer users of the irrigation water service, and non-user citizens) engaged in focus group discussions. The transcriptions were analyzed with an integrated subjective and computer-assisted approach. The main result of the study showed that a convergence of stakeholder opinions led to prioritization of the same four benefits, i.e., hydro-geological and land maintenance, traditional agricultural landscape conservation, biodiversity conservation, and leisure recreational activities provision. Incorporating this information into decision-making processes is relevant in marginal mountain areas, especially in light of the implementation of the water pricing policy laid down in the EU Water Framework Directive. To this end, the economic value of the external benefits should be considered along with the recovery costs for water services. Such information is essential to balance the environmental costs of irrigation and to compare the resource cost of alternative water uses.
Funder
Institut Agricole Régional, Aosta
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Global and Planetary Change
Reference74 articles.
1. The Environmental Impacts of Irrigation in the European Union;Baldock,2000
2. Irrigation Water Management: Irrigation Water Needs;Brouwer,1986
3. Eurostat Data Base
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tag00025/default/table?lang=en
4. Water for Food Water for Life;Falkenmark,2013
5. Managing water in agriculture for food production and other ecosystem services
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献