Abstract
Wetland restoration is a common practice, and, in many cases, it is for mitigation to offset losses of natural wetlands due to human interference. Researchers commonly compare bird, amphibian, and reptile communities between these wetlands and natural wetlands but overlook small mammals. However, terrestrial small mammals are essential to consider as they serve a fundamental role in the ecosystem as seed dispersers and prey for larger wildlife. We conducted small mammal trapping on 26 wetlands (n = 14 restored, n = 12 natural) in West Virginia, USA, in the summers of 2020 and 2021 to obtain and compare community metrics between wetland types. We found that mass, occupancy probability, and community composition were similar between restored and natural wetlands. However, the apparent abundance of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) was higher in natural wetlands (p < 0.001). Because we captured the three rarest species exclusively in natural wetlands, the ability of restored wetlands to provide an adequate habitat for rare or wetland-obligate species may be biologically significant. Restored wetlands mainly offer sufficient habitat for small mammal communities, but apparent abundance in restored wetlands may differ from natural wetlands depending on species.
Funder
USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture McStennis Project
National Science Foundation
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Global and Planetary Change
Reference89 articles.
1. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Wetlands and Water Synthesis,2005
2. Agricultural Conservation Easement Program;Natural Resources Conservation Service [NRCS]
3. Partners in Fish and Wildlife Program;U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS]
4. Mitigation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act: where it comes from, what it means
5. Research: The Effect of Wetland Mitigation Banking on the Achievement of No-Net-Loss