Flexible Techniques to Detect Typical Hidden Errors in Large Longitudinal Datasets

Author:

Bruni Renato1ORCID,Daraio Cinzia1ORCID,Di Leo Simone1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy

Abstract

The increasing availability of longitudinal data (repeated numerical observations of the same units at different times) requires the development of flexible techniques to automatically detect errors in such data. Besides standard types of errors, which can be treated with generic error correction techniques, large longitudinal datasets may present specific problems not easily traceable by the generic techniques. In particular, after applying those generic techniques, time series in the data may contain trends, natural fluctuations and possible surviving errors. To study the data evolution, one main issue is distinguishing those elusive errors from the rest, which should be kept as they are and not flattened or altered. This work responds to this need by identifying some types of elusive errors and by proposing a statistical-mathematical approach to capture their complexity that can be applied after the above generic techniques. The proposed approach is based on a system of indicators and works at the formal level by studying the differences between consecutive values of data series and the symmetries and asymmetries of these differences. It operates regardless of the specific meaning of the data and is thus applicable in a variety of contexts. We implement this approach in a relevant database of European Higher Education institutions (ETER) by analyzing two key variables: “Total academic staff” and “Total number of enrolled students”, which are two of the most important variables, often used in empirical analysis as a proxy for size, and are considered by policymakers at the European level. The results are very promising.

Funder

Sapienza research grants

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference34 articles.

1. OECD (2011). Quality Framework and Guidelines for OECD Statistical Activities, OECD Publishing.

2. Meta-choices in ranking knowledge-based organizations;Daraio;Manag. Decis.,2021

3. Modeling Data and Process Quality in Multi-Input, Multi-Output Information Systems;Ballou;Manag. Sci.,1985

4. Data quality assessment;Pipino;Commun. ACM,2002

5. Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers;Wang;J. Manag. Inf. Syst.,1996

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3