Visual Fixations in Basketball Shooting: Differences between Shooting Conditions

Author:

Amaro Catarina M.12ORCID,Castro Maria António23ORCID,Mendes Rui14ORCID,Gomes Beatriz B.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. CIDAF (Research Unit in Sport and Physical Activity), Faculty of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, University of Coimbra, 3040-248 Coimbra, Portugal

2. CEMMPRE (Centre for Mechanical Engineering, Materials and Processes), ARISE, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Coimbra, 3030-788 Coimbra, Portugal

3. School of Health Sciences, CiTecchCare, CDRSP Polytechnic University of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal

4. Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra Education School, Rua Dom João III—Solum, 3030-329 Coimbra, Portugal

Abstract

Basketball is a sport where shooting is one of the most important factors that determines the success or failure of the teams. Therefore, basketball players need to shoot the ball accurately. The present study aimed to evaluate whether different shooting conditions influence the visual behavior of athletes. For this, the Tobbi Pro Glasses 3 equipment was used to evaluate the time of the first fixation, the number of fixations, and the total time of fixations in the basket, during the shooting movement. Different distances to the basket, simulated gym audience noise, and shooting with opposition were considered. A group of 18 athletes with an average age of 22 ± 3.72 years and an average basketball practice experience of 12.5 ± 4.52 years performed 10 valid shots from different distances and different shooting angles, with different restrictions, namely, shooting with simulated opposition and gym audience noise. Statistically significant differences between shooting with opposition and baseline, in terms of the number of fixations and the total time of fixation, were found. Regarding shooting with gym audience noise, differences only occur for the total time of fixations in one position. Despite this, in all variables and positions, the values were lower in shooting with constraints compared to the baseline.

Funder

FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia

ção para a Ciência e Tecnologia

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference53 articles.

1. Palao, J., Ortega, E., and Olmedilla, A. (2004). Iberian Congress on Basketball Research, Catholic University of San Antonio.

2. Vencúrik, T., Knjaz, D., Rupčić, T., Sporiš, G., and Li, F. (2021). Kinematic analysis of 2-point and 3-point jump shot of elite young male and female basketball players. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.

3. Performance differences between winning losing basketball teams during close, balanced and unbalanced quarters;Csataljay;J. Hum. Sport Exerc.,2012

4. Differences in Kinematic Characteristics Between 2-point and 3-point Basketball Shooting Motions–A Case Study;Cabarkapa;J. Adv. Sports Phys. Educ.,2021

5. Variabilidade inter-individual na estrutura temporal do arremesso no basquetebol;Okazaki;Motriz,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3