Pacing of Human Locomotion on Land and in Water: 1500 m Swimming vs. 5000 m Running

Author:

Demarie Sabrina1ORCID,Pycke Jean Renaud2,Pizzuti Alessia1,Billat Veronique3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, Piazza de Bosis 15, 00135 Rome, Italy

2. Laboratoire de Mathématiques et Modélisation d'Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Univ Evry, 91037 Evry-Courcouronnes, France

3. Department of STAPS, University of Paris-Saclay (Evry), 91037 Evry, France

Abstract

The study of pace strategy in different environments could help to understand its dependence on athletes’ energetic limits or on sport-specific factors. The aim of this study was to analyse the pacing strategy of finalists during seven swimming and running world events held in 2021–2022. The speed of 32 swimmers every 50 m in 1500 m freestyle competitions, and the speed of 55 runners every 100 m in 5000 m track competitions, were analysed. Differences between swimming and running were statistically significant for Total Time (p = 0.00, ES = 1.9), Average Time of splits (p = 0.00, ES = 2.0), Median Time of splits (p = 0.00, ES = 2.0), and Maximal length of split sequences (p = 0.00, ES = 1.3), and non-significantly different for number of Sequences of splits (p = 0.12, ES = 0.5), Percentage of total splits faster than the median speed (p = 0.08, ES = 0.2), Percentage of splits faster than the median speed in the first half (p = 0.16, ES = 0.4) and Percentage of splits faster than the median speed in the second half (p = 0.21, ES = 0.3). In conclusion, despite similar metabolic requirements of 1500 m swimming and 5000 m running, the influence of specific environment and sport type on the pacing strategy of world level competitions seems to be supported.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science

Reference41 articles.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3